Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hot Takes Immediately After the Game


Admiral Ackbar
 Share

Recommended Posts

My takes. 2 wrongs and 1 right. 

Wrong - I thought TMac would take some time to deal with NFL coverage and it would take a couple weeks to get going 

Wrong - I thought XL was going to make a step forward and silence some that I had deemed a tad too hard 

Right - basically everything else I thought overall going into this season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AceMan said:

Overreactions:

-XL is the reason why we drafted TMac; I think our staff knows XL's not starting WR material

-Adam Thielen wanted to go back to Minnesota because he saw a good opportunity to leave this dump

-Wharton flashed a lot before his hamstring problem, Derrick Brown looked good too; D-line looked good overall

- LBs are TERRIBLE and I honestly don't know what were thinking going into the season with this lineup

-Nick Scott will become the new Ian Thomas

-I think everybody knows Bryce can't make it in this league.  

They averaged 7 yards per carry and we got no pressure all game. How did the dline look good agai

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Building a D around Evero has failed. I don't want to hear about how we are primed for 4-3 either. These guys haven't built jack on  that side and I need to see these guys with at least a decent DC before I care about anyone outside of Brown and the 2 starting CBs. 

They O is playing well below their talent level. DC isn't good and his part in all this is garbage. Thankfully Tet isn't another XL but I can't even evaluate him beyond better than that dud with this level of QB play. Most of Young's check should automatically go to Chubba since he is doing all the real work. Much like with the D, the system blows but in thst side it's built around Young so it's not a shocker. 

 

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, toldozer said:

They averaged 7 yards per carry and we got no pressure all game. How did the dline look good agai

I've seen people bring up the "7 yards per carry" a few times already, and while a little bit true (and also a little false), it's also a tad disingenuous

Because they didn't average 7 ypc, they averaged 6.3, which is 10% less.

And if you remove the 71 yarder that Etienne broke off, they only averaged 4.1 ypc the rest of the game.

I'm not saying we were great, and you can't just pick and choose plays to remove from stats to fit a narrative.  But our rush defense was nowhere near as bad as saying "they averaged 7 yards per carry" seems to insinuate.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I've seen people bring up the "7 yards per carry" a few times already, and while a little bit true (and also a little false), it's also a tad disingenuous

Because they didn't average 7 ypc, they averaged 6.3, which is 10% less.

And if you remove the 71 yarder that Etienne broke off, they only averaged 4.1 ypc the rest of the game.

I'm not saying we were great, and you can't just pick and choose plays to remove from stats to fit a narrative.  But our rush defense was nowhere near as bad as saying "they averaged 7 yards per carry" seems to insinuate.

30 carries for 200 yards says they weren't concerned with us stopping the great Etienne 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, toldozer said:

30 carries for 200 yards says they weren't concerned with us stopping the great Etienne 

Again, one play doesn't change a full game's narrative.

They had 32 carries for 200 yards. 

Take away Etienne's single long run of 71 yards, and they only had 129 yards on their other 31 carries.

If I told you a team had 31 carries for 129 yards, I don't think anyone would say that team defended the run poorly in that game.

I'm not excusing this game, the players, the staff, any of it.  I'm just saying people who look at final box scores and try and make the averages or totals be the narrative for an entire game are just being purposefully obtuse to try and make their point and hoping people won't realize it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, I haven't read the thread yet, but I'd say that Dan Morgan and company should have flaming hot seats right about now. All that money to second-rate players in order to fool people into thinking we were actually better. Wharton, Brown III, and Moehrig were overpaid. 

And all of you talking like DB is untouchable, think again. He's about as untouchable as Burns.

We fuging suck against the run. Evero's scheme doesn't maximize efficiency against the run. The Evero experiment has produced nothing but bad results.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Again, one play doesn't change a full game's narrative.

They had 32 carries for 200 yards. 

Take away Etienne's single long run of 71 yards, and they only had 129 yards on their other 31 carries.

If I told you a team had 31 carries for 129 yards, I don't think anyone would say that team defended the run poorly in that game.

I'm not excusing this game, the players, the staff, any of it.  I'm just saying people who look at final box scores and try and make the averages or totals be the narrative for an entire game are just being purposefully obtuse to try and make their point and hoping people won't realize it.

Especially when that 71 yard carry should have been a 7 yard carry if Scott could fuging tackle. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Did anyone else see the FOX halftime crew making fun of our soft zone coverage on Travis Hunter?

Evero needs to go.

I thought they were making fun of Travis Hunter for basically just existing on that defensive rep vs the TMac slant.  Hunter was basically standing and watching 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Did anyone else see the FOX halftime crew making fun of our soft zone coverage on Travis Hunter?

Evero needs to go.

I missed this, any clip monkey with a twatter clip to view??

 

FYI Panthers playing 9th dimmintion chess, ruin the next team tape viewing......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...