Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Officially worse than Matt Rhule


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think he could be a better HC than playcaller. Not sure why he abandoned putting the QB under center as much after the first drive - until he brought Dalton back under center at the end. FYI, those were the 2 TD drives. Bryce missed a couple of throws. But it wasn't as bad as I thought when I was watching live. He was successful for almost every playaction roll out from under center. And then we stopped doing it. The Patriots didn't stop it all game. They actually had a few "DJ Johnson-level" lose contain ends. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CRA said:

Coaches like Canales have to be paired w/ a gunslinger or elite QB.  It's a story as old as time.  Weak boring offenses need the aggressive chunk pass plays to compliment their O.   You saw that in Tampa.  You see that in his entire coaching tree. 

this is the frustrating part about the Panthers.  All this stuff is day 1 stuff and he waste years figuring out the knowns. 

Well he knew when he accepted the job who his QB was so he can fug off with that excuse. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, NAS said:

Well he knew when he accepted the job who his QB was so he can fug off with that excuse. 

Of course.

Although it is necessary to wonder just how far those conversations went in the hiring process. As in when they discussed the plans to "fix" Bryce Young how much leeway does Bryce Young ultimately have if he performs poorly and does Dave Canales have full autonomy to bench him when he feels it's time to make that call? Right now to me it looks like it's Tepper's decision. And if that is indeed the case we're boned no matter who the coach is.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, frankw said:

Of course.

Although it is necessary to wonder just how far those conversations went in the hiring process. As in when they discussed the plans to "fix" Bryce Young how much leeway does Bryce Young ultimately have if he performs poorly and does Dave Canales have full autonomy to bench him when he feels it's time to make that call? Right now to me it looks like it's Tepper's decision. And if that is indeed the case we're boned no matter who the coach is.

Probably why Ben Johnson and others didn’t even bother to interview 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

Probably why Ben Johnson and others didn’t even bother to interview 

He already bowed out after interviewing the year before. I think that was the year he skipped out on Washington after saying their new ownership group acting like they were running an NBA team. I think the Panthers leaked he had a bad interview or some BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

Well he knew when he accepted the job who his QB was so he can fug off with that excuse. 

it's not an excuse really.  It's just acknowledging realities.  And it really appeared Carolian acknowledged it and moved on from Bryce Young SUPER quick a mere 2 games into the Canales era. 

Morgan fugged up by not trading Bryce then.  They let him back on the field and they screwed themselves with this pointless year.  I blame Tepper/Morgan more than Canales. 

Canales is what he is.  We know what we were getting.  We knew his tree. He was also blunt about what he was.  From the jump, Bryce didn't fit.   Seemed like they acknowledged it last year and then went stupid. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Waldo said:

He already bowed out after interviewing the year before. I think that was the year he skipped out on Washington after saying their new ownership group acting like they were running an NBA team. I think the Panthers leaked he had a bad interview or some BS.

that was shane stechin I thought, pretty fuging stupid reason

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...