Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eight of Bryce Young's nine wins have come off game-winning drives


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Look. Jake after the surgery yeah no argument. Before though? Let's not get carried away. He's up there with Cam no doubt.

Jake unlike Cam was tailor made for this type offense and the setup the last 2 weeks 

all I know is if Jake was the QB today, the leading WR wouldn’t of been Horn with 36 yards.  Jake wouldn’t of been able to control himself and would have taken advantage of Dallas desperately trying to stop the run with some f u bombs downfield 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Jake unlike Cam was tailor made for this type offense and the setup the last 2 weeks 

all I know is if Jake was the QB today, the leading WR wouldn’t of been Horn with 36 yards.  Jake wouldn’t of been able to control himself and would have taken advantage of Dallas desperately trying to stop the run with some f u bombs downfield 

This is something people forget about the John Fox offenses (especially those who weren't paying attention to football during it). It was a mix of power run and Air Coryell. You'd absolutely gash the other team on the ground, opening up deep shots downfield. It's how Steve Smith was so dominant for much of his career, and how Moose had his best ever year in 2004.

Jake led the lead in YP/C in 2008 in large part because of this vertical focus. It was very well suited to a vertical focus. But you need a gunslinger QB and a receiver that can catch anything to make it work. Jake would just chuck the ball, pray, and Smitty would grab it.

Edited by TN05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, TN05 said:

This is something people forget about the John Fox offenses (especially those who weren't paying attention to football during it). It was a mix of power run and Air Coryell. You'd absolutely gash the other team on the ground, opening up deep shots downfield. It's how Steve Smith was so dominant for much of his career, and how Moose had his best ever year in 2004.

Jake led the lead in YP/C in 2008 in large part because of this vertical focus. It was very well suited to a vertical focus. But you need a gunslinger QB and a receiver that can catch anything to make it work. Jake would just chuck the ball, pray, and Smitty would grab it.

And we see how that offensive philosophy turned out in the playoffs against Arizona 😞

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrBdawg said:

And we see how that offensive philosophy turned out in the playoffs against Arizona 😞

That’s was Tommy Jone.  His arm was never right after that.  

that philosophy got us to a Super Bowl 2003 and the O played good enough to win vs the GOAT.   Jake might still own the longest Super Bowl TD pass? 

Another NFCCG 2 years later. Him torching the Bears to get there is one of my all time favorite games.  

Jake was fun.  Frustrating but fun

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PadresPanthersFan said:

The defense can win the game. Fields is cheeks,  the run d needs to show up again, and put horn on wilson ( even tho stubborn evero won't) and they don't score. 

Apparently Horn asked Evero to put him on Pickens that last series. It’s bad when the player has to tell the coach the obvious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

34 starts

Bryce has trailed in the 4th quarter in 33 of the 34 games. 

Exactly, this is all I hear when seeing this stat.

It's great that he has a bunch of come from behind wins already, but it's also because that was going to be the only way he'd ever win those games, largely because of the way he played early in all of them.

It's like the episode of Modern Family where Luke gets an award from the school for putting out a fire... that he also started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...