Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce's X-Factor


Recommended Posts

I was just thinking to myself how I'll know a lot about the gameplan by how we start, does Bryce let it fly etc. Then I remembered a thought I've had recently, Bryce could really do more damage with his scrambling ability.

There are a lot of times I notice Bryce if he committed to running would for sure get the first down, but he's still looking to pass. I think Bryce while not one of the great mobile QB's, can use it as a weapon and hurt a defense, he has had some impressive runs. This week where every possession is crucial, I think he needs to make his scrambling ability a true threat also, might open up the passing game a lot.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with that is that we face a lot of stacked boxes and Bryce isn't an above average athlete as a QB. He can use his feet to buy more time to throw but he doesn't possess the ability to pull away from many defenders. 

He is adept at recognizing when they drop deep in coverage and punishing for that but he isn't a true running QB.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our best chance tomorrow is to just go out there and play as aggressively as possible. Throw the ball downfield, run trick plays, blitz, go for it on 4th down a bunch, etc.

We're probably going to lose anyway; I'd just assume lose 48-6 playing to win than lose 28-10 playing conservatively.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I think our best chance tomorrow is to just go out there and play as aggressively as possible. Throw the ball downfield, run trick plays, blitz, go for it on 4th down a bunch, etc.

We're probably going to lose anyway; I'd just assume lose 48-6 playing to win than lose 28-10 playing conservatively.

Careful, that kind of thinking is what gets you a horrible flea flicker attempt from the Rams 10 yard line...

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Careful, that kind of thinking is what gets you a horrible flea flicker attempt from the Rams 10 yard line...

Maybe, but that's the nature of trick plays. In a more even matchup I'd say play ball control and drain the clock, but if we're going down we might as well go down swinging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Careful, that kind of thinking is what gets you a horrible flea flicker attempt from the Rams 10 yard line...

I still find it hard to believe that was the call. I gotta believe (for my own sanity) that that play was just Rico screwing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...