Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan: Panthers will pickup BY’s 5th year.


Tbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

People on this board thought it wasn’t gonna picked up? Lol

no LOL i disagree i think almost everyone knew it was going to actually happen ? 

you are getting acceptance & approval somehow mixed up ? ...just saying 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

$26M on year 5 is between Baker and Fields current salaries. 
I’d say in two years that’s probably below that talent level.

As has been discussed already, it buys us time to figure out the long-term solution. I’d be more upset if we extend him before the end of the ‘26 season. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

People on this board thought it wasn’t gonna picked up? Lol

Next up, 5 year 260m extension with a 155m signing bonus. Will be done before draft time. Other franchises move on from their mistakes. Panthers double, triple down, bet the house and their 1st born child that Bryce will defy 60 years of NFL history. We are so fuging stupid. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see how this is controversial in the slightest. We're simply buying some more time to make a long term decision. That way, we can use valuable resources to improve other areas and there are plenty of those.

That and if you actually look at the alternate path, who would be the next QB? The FA market from what I see... no, thank you. And this upcoming QB class... yeesh. It's so easy to talk about replacing a QB, but Vikings gambled on McCarthy over Darnold and that completely blew up in their faces.

As for a long term contract, I still hold onto the philosophy that even for "franchise" QB's, it's not worth it once the cap hit forces you to lose other players on the team as a consequence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, outlaw4 said:

I don’t see how this is controversial in the slightest. We're simply buying some more time to make a long term decision. That way, we can use valuable resources to improve other areas and there are plenty of those.

That and if you actually look at the alternate path, who would be the next QB? The FA market from what I see... no, thank you. And this upcoming QB class... yeesh. It's so easy to talk about replacing a QB, but Vikings gambled on McCarthy over Darnold and that completely blew up in their faces.

As for a long term contract, I still hold onto the philosophy that even for "franchise" QB's, it's not worth it once the cap hit forces you to lose other players on the team as a consequence.

My alternative, tell Bryce he's playing on his final year and we're bringing in competition for the starting role. His play hasn't earned a 5th year option. Everyone seems to be hung up on these wins while forgetting how badly our offense looked all season from the QB position, minus a single game in Atlanta. His play has been backup caliber. 

Brissett, a backup that signed for 6 million per season, just threw for 3300 yards and 23/8 in Arizona in 14 games, with 12 of those being starts. Daniel Jones was having a resurgence before injury took his season. When you're playing less than backup quality, you don't deserve to have a guaranteed starter position for 2 years, especially when the 2nd year is 26.5m. 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

My alternative, tell Bryce he's playing on his final year and we're bringing in competition for the starting role. His play hasn't earned a 5th year option. Everyone seems to be hung up on these wins while forgetting how badly our offense looked all season from the QB position, minus a single game in Atlanta. His play has been backup caliber. 

Brissett, a backup that signed for 6 million per season, just threw for 3300 yards and 23/8 in Arizona in 14 games, with 12 of those being starts. Daniel Jones was having a resurgence before injury took his season. When you're playing less than backup quality, you don't deserve to have a guaranteed starter position for 2 years, especially when the 2nd year is 26.5m. 

 

This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

I know many of us are already looking forward to a stat line of 10/22 for 74 yards 1 td 1 int.

For the entire game.

Next season is just around the corner now.

the 27th ranked offense is back baby!!! 

If you only focus on like 3 games and ignore the rest, it's pretty dang good stuff!  Said, every poor performer in NFL history. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

My alternative, tell Bryce he's playing on his final year and we're bringing in competition for the starting role. His play hasn't earned a 5th year option. Everyone seems to be hung up on these wins while forgetting how badly our offense looked all season from the QB position, minus a single game in Atlanta. His play has been backup caliber. 

Brissett, a backup that signed for 6 million per season, just threw for 3300 yards and 23/8 in Arizona in 14 games, with 12 of those being starts. Daniel Jones was having a resurgence before injury took his season. When you're playing less than backup quality, you don't deserve to have a guaranteed starter position for 2 years, especially when the 2nd year is 26.5m. 

 

Damn, I didn’t know Brissetts stats were like that…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Why don't you apply those same standards to Young?

BY shoulda been Howell'd after his rook season. But no...we are going to trot him out there another year...like he grew 5" and has a strong arm and processing abilities. We need someone for when hes benched next year. It wouldn't take much to beat him out in competition...if there wasn't an agenda.

Edited by Johnstonny
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MORGAN ON PLAY CALLER FOR CANALES   "I think that's really his [Canales'] call," he stated. "I think if he wants to promote somebody into being the play-caller or bring somebody from the outside. We haven't really talked about that. But that is something that I'm sure we'll talk about. We talk about every decision together. If he feels like he needs to add somebody or promote somebody into being the play-caller, then I trust him."  
    • Dude, he cannot see the field, when his feet are not set he throws ducks.   What the fug are you watching?
    • I'm looking at the final drive, and that's where I'm laying the blame at Bryce's feet. Stepping up to the line, 38 seconds left, 3 time outs on the clock. 30 yards needed to attempt a FG. It's not Bryce's job to call the plays, that's DC's and it was terrible play calling.  It's Bryce's job to read what the defense is giving him at the line. The middle of the field is open. Rams are guarding against the deep ball and bringing pressure leaving the middle of the field ripe for the taking. Knowing his line not holding up for long, Bryce should have read the defense, called the audible, and thrown to the middle of the field for 6- 8 yards, like you said, quick slants would have worked. Then run either hurry up or call a TO. We had time. He has to make the adjustments. Any QB has to make the adjustments.  The pass Horn dropped hit his hands but was at his knees. Should he have slid and caught it? Probably. Was the pass a good one? No it wasn't. Both players were at fault, not just Horn. Let's not pretend that Bryce threw a beautiful pass that hit the receiver chest high right in the hands in perfect stride because that damn sure wasn't the throw.  The defense didn't choke away a lead. They never had a real lead. Choking away a lead is being up by multiple scores late in the 4th and losing. We were up by 4 and handed the ball back to a potential MVP with an All pro WR and potential future HoF WR2. One score games in the 4th are a slug fest. 28-3. That's choking away a lead.  I don't solely blame Bryce for the game, but you seem to solely blame the defense for the game because they went to prevent after losing Horn. You are forgetting the short field that the offense left them that led to the early Puka TD on one of our 2 failed 4th down conversions. Our defense has been given very limited resources over the past 3 years while we have tried to put everything possible around Bryce. We added a little bit to the D this year after giving up a NFL record in points last year. Our defense overachieved based on what they've been given to work with. 
×
×
  • Create New...