Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton Agrees to 5 year contract extension worth 103 million.

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jackofalltrades Proficient

Jackofalltrades

Posted
Posted

you got to love taint fans for thinking we overpaid for cam, this is coming from a team who had to shed their best talent because their GM pooched the cap with massive overspending on FAs that haven't panned out (Byrd) or by paining in house talent that just isn't worth it (Galette)

What "best talent" are you referring to?

 

Disregard, I missed a very important word that changes the entire context, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jasonluckydog Grand Master

jasonluckydog

Posted
Posted

If I can pontificate a bit, for your education, one of the rules of the Internet is "There are no girls on the Internet". This rule does not mean what you think it means.

 

In real life, people like you for being a girl. They want to #$%$ you, so they pay attention to you and pretend what you have to say is interesting, or that you are smart or clever. On the Internet, we don't have the chance to #$%$ you. This means that the advantage of being a "girl" does not exist. You don't get a bonus to conversation just because I'd like to put my #$%$ in you.

 

When you make a post like, "hurr durr, I'm a girl" you are begging for attention. The only reason to post it is because you want your girl-advantage back, because you are too vapid and too stupid to do or say anything interesting without it. You are forgetting the rules, there are no girls on the Internet.

 

The one exception to this rule, the one way you can get your "girlness" back on the internet, is to post your #$%$. This is, and should be, degrading for you, an admission that the only interesting thing about you is your naked body.

 

TL/DR: #$%$ or GTFO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

If I can pontificate a bit, for your education, one of the rules of the Internet is "There are no girls on the Internet". This rule does not mean what you think it means.

 

In real life, people like you for being a girl. They want to #$%$ you, so they pay attention to you and pretend what you have to say is interesting, or that you are smart or clever. On the Internet, we don't have the chance to #$%$ you. This means that the advantage of being a "girl" does not exist. You don't get a bonus to conversation just because I'd like to put my #$%$ in you.

 

When you make a post like, "hurr durr, I'm a girl" you are begging for attention. The only reason to post it is because you want your girl-advantage back, because you are too vapid and too stupid to do or say anything interesting without it. You are forgetting the rules, there are no girls on the Internet.

 

The one exception to this rule, the one way you can get your "girlness" back on the internet, is to post your #$%$. This is, and should be, degrading for you, an admission that the only interesting thing about you is your naked body.

 

TL/DR: #$%$ or GTFO

I'm confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
arbnranger Explorer

arbnranger

Posted
Posted

If I can pontificate a bit, for your education, one of the rules of the Internet is "There are no girls on the Internet". This rule does not mean what you think it means.

 

In real life, people like you for being a girl. They want to #$%$ you, so they pay attention to you and pretend what you have to say is interesting, or that you are smart or clever. On the Internet, we don't have the chance to #$%$ you. This means that the advantage of being a "girl" does not exist. You don't get a bonus to conversation just because I'd like to put my #$%$ in you.

 

When you make a post like, "hurr durr, I'm a girl" you are begging for attention. The only reason to post it is because you want your girl-advantage back, because you are too vapid and too stupid to do or say anything interesting without it. You are forgetting the rules, there are no girls on the Internet.

 

The one exception to this rule, the one way you can get your "girlness" back on the internet, is to post your #$%$. This is, and should be, degrading for you, an admission that the only interesting thing about you is your naked body.

 

TL/DR: #$%$ or GTFO

That sounds like a George Carlin inspired rant. Nice!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I think the first 3 picks will be defensive players this time. At least that's how the draft is falling this year. I would not be shocked at all if our 1st pick is the number one safety in the draft. It appears he will be right there for the taking. 
    • strato
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By strato · Posted

      Man oh man. That 8-9 record without a playoff berth puts at 13 if I recall, ahead of both Atlanta and TB with their 8-9 records, due to our weaker SOS.   We might have been in range to deal for that guy. I hope he doesn’t last to 8. And I hope some AFC team picks him. 
    • strato
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By strato · Posted

      Cool. I am not wanting to debate or argue it. It is mostly my preferences. But a couple of things:  I just don’t think he sees the middle of the field well. But besides that I would rather spend a 1st round pick at different offensive positions if we went offense, otherwise we have neglected defense something fierce the last few years. Last 1st rounder was Horn. That’s like 5 years ago now.   Investments… gee the last 4 drafts we have used a 2, a 2, a low 1st and a top ten pick on WR. Bryce has been here three years, three of those picks were specifically for him.  And assets, I don’t think you are counting the haul we gave for the QB position. That counts and it was huge.   Add that up and add the Burns cap space we freed up when we traded him. We bought two guards and used the savings on them. Not on the defense.  I mean, that is a lot of investment in the offense when you put all that in a sack and weigh it.    peace. Appreciate your post.   
×
×
  • Create New...