Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Proehl high on receivers. What else would he say? It's Tongue-in-cheek. Relax, pansies!


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Surprise, surprise! Coach Proehl "talks up the talent in Carolina", per PFT.  I mean what else is he going to say? Let me tell you. I will read between the lines and tell you what he could have wanted to say, but couldn't. 

“We’re going to have to let some good players go,” Proehl told ESPN. “It’ll work itself out, but as a coach, if I can’t be productive with what I’ve got, then that’s on me.”

What he could have said:

I finally have a half-way decent pool of receivers to actually put an NFL-ready wide receiving corps on the field on game days. Dave really did a number on me last year sacrificing my group on the alter of the business side of the football gods. They are a great bunch of guys, but unfortunately some are going to have to go, but that's just the nature of the beast. I am just so relieved to be in this position. Now, I can actually smile, take some responsibility and espouse the company line.

“We’ve got every weapon in our arsenal,” Proehl said. “I look around my room and you’ve just got not just really good football players, but good guys that work hard, that study, smart players. From a coaching standpoint, it’s exciting that you can go out and really coach.”

What he could have said:

Man, I've actually got some guys with above average potential, and some with some actual seasoning as opposed to the circus last year. Now I have a mostly young and hungry squad that I can mold without the hindrances of bad attitudes and larger than life egos.  Unlike the last couple of years, I can actually play to guys' strengths, and I am free to actually coach as opposed to babysitting. 

 

Alright, Coach, I get that you're happy and relieved and all that, and I hope that your optimism, as well as everyone else's---including my own---is fully warranted. Let's all pray that the talent that you see and envision comes to fruition on the field, and meshes well with some new-found machinations by an equally optimistic Mike Shula (pushed along a little by Riverboat Ron).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm not sure what else we want from our WR group. KB is a proven talent who can go toe to toe with the best and biggest corners in the league, Corey is also proven and bigger and faster and swagged out, Hill is immensely talented and has had the focus and the drive to make the team and be the threat he was made to be, Funchess is a giant intelligent stud who is going to have favorable matchups to gain confidence and produce, Ginn is a home run threat on special teams and on offense and he is back in his comfort zone with Cam and Ricky, Boykin, Cotchery, etc. are good dudes that are team oriented and willing to work wherever they can.

Who else do you want as a WR? No team has something we don't have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprise, surprise! Coach Proehl "talks up the talent in Carolina", per PFT.  I mean what else is he going to say? Let me tell you. I will read between the lines and tell you what he could have wanted to say, but couldn't. 

 

​He didn't have to say  “It’ll work itself out, but as a coach, if I can’t be productive with what I’ve got, then that’s on me.”

Other coaches could have easily said that they would like to have a top performing veteran come in, or simply that they still aren't quite where they'd like to be with the roster. It's on him, and I like it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember the Corey Brown of late last year, when he started to "get it" and play fast without thinking? I think people will be shocked at the play of Brown this year .. He will have a stand out year.

Then you have Stephen Hill, Hopefully a full year under the teaching of Proehl will bring out the true 1st round talent, I know its OTAs but I like the sounds coming out about Hill.

I think all the critics will be shocked with the Panthers passing game this year. 

I really hope it all works out and we get to see these lineups

KB, Brown(slot), Funch --- 3 wides

KB, Brown(slot), Funch(slot), Hill -- 4 wides

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, top dawg, I bet you're always the life of the party.

You seem like so much fun to be around.

God forbid a little optimism, right?

You are putting a lot of your words in Proehl's mouth. That's just not cool. If you have opinions, then give them but don't pass them off as Proehl's.

I realize that there is a disconnect between what is said and how things are actually taken on the Internet, but I guess that you missed that the OP is mostly tongue-in-cheek. Proehl is very happy and should be after enduring what he has had to endure for the last couple of years. The corps was basically gutted and started anew last year, partly in order to move us to this point this year under a healthier cap situation. Dave Gettleman said something to that effect after the season, referencing making sacrifices last off-season in order to get us back cap healthy.

 

I am not putting words in Proehl's mouth as much as I am trying to get into his head. The whole thing is like the segment on ESPN when they say "He said this, but what he really wanted to say is..." So, chill out. 

 

Tiger, I guess you missed the part where I admitted my optimism as well.  also guess that you also missed the thread after the draft where I mentioned that we should be highly optimistic being that we finally drafted another legit receiving threat in Devin Funchess. And you are intimating that I am a stick in the mud...

 

Chill.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why does everyone like to blame Dave because he didn't fill our roster with 53 HOF players in his first two years? patience, Doggie-San. The roster has improved every year DG has been here, and will continue to do so.

Why do many huddlers seem. to forget what DG said in one of his first press conference? Just paraphrasing he said something to the effect it was going to take him three years to get the cap situation straightened out. This is year 3. Someone correct me if im wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...