Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brenton Bersin continues to impress

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Yaboychris28 Newbie

Yaboychris28

Posted
Posted

I really doubt Cotch brings as much to the locker room as everyone assumes he does. Last year maybe, but who wants to be mentored by an older guy who isn't very good? I'm sure the recievers look up to KB more now and Proehl brings the veteran experience. 

Exactly. Maybe if it was a player who use to be an all pro, but it's Cotchery..
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted

I've got nothing against Bersin.  I want him gone for one reason:  takes away possibilities for more bad decisions by Shula.  I don't fault Bersin for putting Bersin in bad situations.  I fault Shula.  Same reason I'd rather have Cotchery gone (flea flicker to Cotchery?!).  It's about putting a team out there that Shula can't fug up, because that's the only way to field a good offense.  Make it Shulaproof.  Because if he can, he will fug it up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted

I've got nothing against Bersin.  I want him gone for one reason:  takes away possibilities for more bad decisions by Shula.  I don't fault Bersin for putting Bersin in bad situations.  I fault Shula.  Same reason I'd rather have Cotchery gone (flea flicker to Cotchery?!).  It's about putting a team out there that Shula can't fug up, because that's the only way to field a good offense.  Make it Shulaproof.  Because if he can, he will fug it up.

Do you sShula Proof it by  simply putting in new guys he doesn't know how to  utilize either? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I'm just not a fan of receivers past third on the depth chart that are slow and can't get seperation and Yac and don't play ST. 

Agreed.. 

Bersin and Cotchery are the 2 least naturally talented Wr on the roster... Best case scenario neither one of them makes it..... 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EightyNine Newbie

EightyNine

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'm just not a fan of receivers past third on the depth chart that are slow and can't get seperation and Yac and don't play ST. 

​On any team, most people probably arent fans of the WRs who are past third on the depth chart.  I'd be interested to hear how many receptions and yards people think a WR4 should have..

Since he cant play ST, if he is as bad at getting separation as a lot of you think, it should be the easiest decision ever for the coaches to cut him...seems like a reasonable thought, right?

When youre talking about WR4s, you cant judge them like they are going to be a huge part of the offense.  They are guys that fill a very small specific role...  If Bersin can be a dependable guy that can move the chains on 3rd down every once in awhile, then thats about as much as you can expect from a WR4.  Anything more is just gravy.

Edited by EightyNine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...