Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL on ESPN: C.Johnson NFL most over paid player


Jmac

Recommended Posts

You can't just look at the worst cap hit on a six year deal. It's not his fault Hurney backloaded his contract. Over the course of his contract it averages 12.5 mil a year which is pretty much in line with what premier DEs make.

 

​Well, if you look at it in a range and broad spectrum, sure.  But just this year, no.  fug no.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't just look at the worst cap hit on a six year deal. It's not his fault Hurney backloaded his contract. Over the course of his contract it averages 12.5 mil a year which is pretty much in line with what premier DEs make.

 

You've been here long enough no know there's no room for sense or logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d ask many of you how many top tier defensive ends actually hit the market after being as productive as he was with his potential heading into that contract…bad structure not a bad contract.

 

Like others have mentioned without Hardy the ENTIRE defense slipped, teams could slide protection to him, and double him, not to mention a nagging injury. Hopefully Ealy, or Alexander emerge as consistent threats to allow CJ to play to his contracts value all season. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't like the structure, and still don't, but, with us not touching it this year like most GM's would have done, it sets us up nicely next season.

 

We did overpay Big Money, but not by much.  The way the contract was set up is what is screwing us.  Cam's deal is set up much better than this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​I wonder if ESPN took into account CJ against the run. 

 

2 or 3 years ago he had double digit sacks AND double digit tackles behind scrimmage.

 

He may be a little overpaid but he is a good player, keeps his nose clean and is very good as an all-around lineman.

​He also had 7 forced fumbles in 2012. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...