Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is this year's surprise star in the sb


w280sax

Recommended Posts

Last year, Chris matthews, wr for seattle, was the best the best player no one really expected to contribute.  Of course seattle lost but he was a dark horse mvp candidate if they had won.  He has since been cut and later signed by baltimore.

My question is what panther (or bronco if you must) will make a big contribution to the game that no one would expect?  It could be one big play that changes the game or just a good overall game from somewhere unexpected.

I'm going to guess teddy williams will force a big fumble on a punt or kickoff return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Lemory said:

Shaq. Either an int return or a fumble return. 

I gotta go with Shaq as well. he hasn't created a lot of buzz this season, but IMO is on the cusp of kicking serious ass. He should get a lot more snaps with TD being hurt.

I would also loooooove to see Funchess catch a couple of touch downs or Fozzy get to the endzone, but Shaq has the edge IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

Boston. I think he is getting it together and may see more action if we can get ahead quick and force them to lean away from the run. 

This wouldn't surprise me though, he had an int  last week and a sack against Seattle. I agree that he has a big game though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...