Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Power Rankings, Are We Really a Top 10 Team?


Pantha-kun

Recommended Posts

NFL.com : #8

ESPN : #8

Yahoo : #7 

Bleeding Green Nation : #8

CBS Sports : #7

Bleacher Report : #5 

Walterfootball : #7

You think these rankings are justified? The last poll we averaged around the 10 spot and now we are averaging around the 7 spot , after a week where we didn't even play a game lol. I think its mostly because the Cheifs lost. The way things are trending if we manage to beat the Jets on Sunday and the Saints on Dec. 3rd, we should be a top 5 team no questions. 

As of right now though? I'm not sure. At least our victory against the Falcons is looking a bit more credible now that they're starting to string together wins .And the Lions are also starting to find a groove so they're both increasing our strength of schedule.  I'm not sure how much stock to take from beating the Dolphins, or even if we simularly blow out the Jets. I'd still have kept us around the 10 spot honestly, unless we beat the Saints and/or Vikings. If we win the next 3 games, then we should probably be right in line for the #2 seed and right below the Eagles in the power rankings. .But of course that's looking fairly far into the future . 

I guess looking at it from a positive light, we lost to Saints (top 5 team) , Eagles (Top 2 team) , and the Bears. So the only bad loss we had the entire season was against the Bears , and I'm willing to give pretty much every team not named the 07 Patriots or 72 Dolphins at least 1 game where they either have an off day, some weird poo happens , or they run into a team late in the season whos out of contention and treating the game like their super bowl.  

I'd say things are trending up but we've yet to face true tests in the 2nd half of the season. I think the Saints and Vikings are on a whole nother level. But at least the Redskins showed the Saints aren't immortal, and the Rams were doing pretty well against the Vikings until that Cooper Kupp fumble on the 1. And the Giants showed anything is possible with a hellacious defense .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the AFC is terrible, only teams in AFC that may be better than us are NE (who we beat) and PIT. NFC is stacked though.  I don't think we are as good as PHI or NO, MIN and LAR would be toss ups.  I think somewhere around 7 sounds right.  Two of our 3 losses were to the best teams in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d put the following teams in front of us:

philly, New Orleans, Minnesota, Pittsburgh and New England. 

I’d have us at six, with the Falcons, Rams and Lions all right there with us.  I’d have the jags there too, but I can’t put a team with Blake Bortles as their qb in the same class as the other teams listed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

We're one season out from 15-1 with the number one ranked defense and an offense that is getting healthier by the day.

No one wants to see Carolina in the playoffs, home or away.

Agree. I expect us to win the division and go for the 2 seed with a bye but I think we'd be a good bet to win any playoff game regardless of what seed we are. Most of the NFC playoff teams don't have the recent playoff experience we have... I see these 6 teams making the playoffs, no seeding order:

Panthers, Aints, Eagles, Vikings, Rams, Lions.

Brees and Payton obviously have playoff experience but the rest of the team hasn't been there in 4 years. Eagles have none. Vikings have essentially none--just the one Seattle game--and Keenum in particular if he's still playing will get rattled in the playoffs. Rams have none. Lions have just one game 3 years ago. 

 

Falcons or Seahawks could creep in there but I don't see it happening. Falcons' schedule is tough while the Lions' is a joke after this Vikings game (and they already beat them once in MN, could see them winning again at home). Seahawks are terrible without Sherman and Chancellor and aren't making it.

 

EDIT: Forgot the Lions made the playoffs last year... Got smoked by Seattle. So they're the most experience of the bunch with just 2 first round games in the past 4 years, both losses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Camp Fodder said:

My whole issue is our starting receivers are funchess and shepherd. Along with clay and bersin. 3 of those would never see the field on most teams

True but getting back a healthy Olsen and keeping CMC and even Dickson involved in the passing game should provide some options as long as we can reestablish the run with CMC and Stew/CAP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're just as good as any team in the NFC and that was with a QB with a bad shoulder learning a new system. With what Cam and McCaffrey can do, getting back Olsen, and solid D play, barring any injuries we are just as good as any team in the NFL. The only way we lose is making mental mistakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...