Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 mil to Torrey Smith is no big deal. It's not.

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

 Just try to be objective.

Golden Tate $31,000,000 $6,200,000
Terrelle Pryor $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Travis Benjamin $24,000,000 $6,000,000
Mike Wallace $11,500,000 $5,750,000
Amari Cooper $22,663,120 $5,665,780
Jeremy Maclin $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Brandon Marshall $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Markus Wheaton $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Julian Edelman $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Seth Roberts $10,485,000 $5,242,500
Torrey Smith $15,000,000 $5,000,000
Rishard Matthews $15,000,000 $5,000,000
Sammy Watkins $19,935,603 $4,983,901
Mike Williams $19,750,056 $4,937,514
Adam Thielen $19,246,000 $4,811,500
Jermaine Kearse $13,500,000 $4,500,000
Brandon LaFell $9,000,000 $4,500,000
John Ross $17,115,864 $4,278,966
Cordarrelle Patterson $8,500,000 $4,250,000
Terrance Williams $17,000,000 $4,250,000
Kevin White $16,563,048 $4,140,762
Eric Decker $4,000,000 $4,000,000
Chris Hogan $12,000,000 $4,000,000
Jarius Wright $14,800,000 $3,700,000
Ted Ginn $11,000,000 $3,666,667

https://overthecap.com/position/wide-receiver

 

Now if you're going to tell me that 29 year old Smith ain't in this class of receiver,  then there's no reason to talk. 

 He is nobody's WR1, and that's how San Francisco was trying to treat him. So he had a bad couple of years. 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/fantasy-football-metrics-that-matter-torrey-smiths-awful-draw-the-last-2-years

In Philly,  he was realistically their third option,  so he didn't get a lot of run (and dropped 4 out of 60-something balls), but he came through in the clutch.  Philly may not have pulled it off without him. 

Just think of him as Ginn 2.0. He's largely a one-trick pony who might still have something close to that 4.36 speed (Philly fans did say that he was still fast), meant only to make defenses pay in the event that they disrespect his speed. Plus, he's a great locker room guy who has a couple of rings.  And,  correct me if I'm wrong,  his salary is not even guaranteed this year.  

Now of course I ask myself why him as opposed to Mike Wallace? Well,  Norv Turner knows Mike Wallace, and I'm fairly sure that Ron and Marty didn't summarily decide that Wallace wasn't what they were looking for.  There must have been at least one compelling reason why they didn't explore him further.  That being said,  Smith can provide the same thing that Wallace can, and Ginn did,  which is speed with so-so hands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 Just try to be objective.

Golden Tate $31,000,000 $6,200,000
Terrelle Pryor $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Travis Benjamin $24,000,000 $6,000,000
Mike Wallace $11,500,000 $5,750,000
Amari Cooper $22,663,120 $5,665,780
Jeremy Maclin $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Brandon Marshall $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Markus Wheaton $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Julian Edelman $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Seth Roberts $10,485,000 $5,242,500
Torrey Smith $15,000,000 $5,000,000
Rishard Matthews $15,000,000 $5,000,000
Sammy Watkins $19,935,603 $4,983,901
Mike Williams $19,750,056 $4,937,514
Adam Thielen $19,246,000 $4,811,500
Jermaine Kearse $13,500,000 $4,500,000
Brandon LaFell $9,000,000 $4,500,000
John Ross $17,115,864 $4,278,966
Cordarrelle Patterson $8,500,000 $4,250,000
Terrance Williams $17,000,000 $4,250,000
Kevin White $16,563,048 $4,140,762
Eric Decker $4,000,000 $4,000,000
Chris Hogan $12,000,000 $4,000,000
Jarius Wright $14,800,000 $3,700,000
Ted Ginn $11,000,000 $3,666,667

https://overthecap.com/position/wide-receiver

 

Now if you're going to tell me that 29 year old Smith ain't in this class of receiver,  then there's no reason to talk. 

 He is nobody's WR1, and that's how San Francisco was trying to treat him. So he had a bad couple of years. 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/fantasy-football-metrics-that-matter-torrey-smiths-awful-draw-the-last-2-years

In Philly,  he was realistically their third option,  so he didn't get a lot of run (and dropped 4 out of 60-something balls), but he came through in the clutch.  Philly may not have pulled it off without him. 

Just think of him as Ginn 2.0. He's largely a one-trick pony who might still have something close to that 4.36 speed (Philly fans did say that he was still fast), meant only to make defenses pay in the event that they disrespect his speed. Plus, he's a great locker room guy who has a couple of rings.  And,  correct me if I'm wrong,  his salary is not even guaranteed this year.  

Now of course I ask myself why him as opposed to Mike Wallace? Well,  Norv Turner knows Mike Wallace, and I'm fairly sure that Ron and Marty didn't summarily decide that Wallace wasn't what they were looking for.  There must have been at least one compelling reason why they didn't explore him further.  That being said,  Smith can provide the same thing that Wallace can, and Ginn did,  which is speed with so-so hands. 

Thanks Dawg.  I would add that Smith's contract is unguaranteed (originally 3 years, $15m with $500k guaranteed)--so he would consider a pay cut for guaranteed money and an extension.  If not, we have no dead money for cutting him.  It is a good contract for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted

I actually have to come to like the move, provided they move on from Shepherd and look to add another piece at the position.

 

It really ensures we aren't in a disaster scenario as was so common throughout the previous regime where we put all our chips on one draft night opportunity to fix a position and when it doesn't work out we head into the season starting players who wouldnt make most team's rosters

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Thanks Dawg.  I would add that Smith's contract is unguaranteed (originally 3 years, $15m with $500k guaranteed)--so he would consider a pay cut for guaranteed money and an extension.  If not, we have no dead money for cutting him.  It is a good contract for us.

This is key, Hurney likes the player and knows he can work that contract to significantly reduce the cap hit... would expect that to be announced very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted

It is when it leaves you 19 mil to spend (5  of it will go to rookies) and still have holes at

WR (Smith is a deep slot #3), LG (Center Kalil missing 50% of games last 2 seasons and retiring after this season), FS, CB, NT, DE, RB, and a backup QB 

 

 

 

If we cut Shepard itd make me feel better.

 

If not, we have 4 Slot WR on the roster (Smith, Shepard, Bryd, Samuel) with a ton of holes and little to spend

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

I was concerned initially by reports Phi was cutting him.  Then I was worried about the remaining money and current salary on his deal.

Now that all the info is out regarding his guaranteed money being paid and we have 0 cap hit if we cut him, Worley for Smith was a good deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

Unless you feel a significant loss from Worley, I don't see how this can be considered a bad deal. Does anyone think he could have fetched anything better than a 5th round pick from another team?

It's entirely possible Torrey is  just an insurance policy in the event we cant do any better at the position in free agency. Essentially just a way to hedge our bets and make sure we got the veteran presence Rivera mentioned. 

Ideally I would still like us try to improve the position in free agency. If we can land a better talent than Torrey then we can offer him a more cap friendly deal to us or let him walk with 0 consequence. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...