Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 mil to Torrey Smith is no big deal. It's not.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

 Just try to be objective.

Golden Tate $31,000,000 $6,200,000
Terrelle Pryor $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Travis Benjamin $24,000,000 $6,000,000
Mike Wallace $11,500,000 $5,750,000
Amari Cooper $22,663,120 $5,665,780
Jeremy Maclin $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Brandon Marshall $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Markus Wheaton $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Julian Edelman $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Seth Roberts $10,485,000 $5,242,500
Torrey Smith $15,000,000 $5,000,000
Rishard Matthews $15,000,000 $5,000,000
Sammy Watkins $19,935,603 $4,983,901
Mike Williams $19,750,056 $4,937,514
Adam Thielen $19,246,000 $4,811,500
Jermaine Kearse $13,500,000 $4,500,000
Brandon LaFell $9,000,000 $4,500,000
John Ross $17,115,864 $4,278,966
Cordarrelle Patterson $8,500,000 $4,250,000
Terrance Williams $17,000,000 $4,250,000
Kevin White $16,563,048 $4,140,762
Eric Decker $4,000,000 $4,000,000
Chris Hogan $12,000,000 $4,000,000
Jarius Wright $14,800,000 $3,700,000
Ted Ginn $11,000,000 $3,666,667

https://overthecap.com/position/wide-receiver

 

Now if you're going to tell me that 29 year old Smith ain't in this class of receiver,  then there's no reason to talk. 

 He is nobody's WR1, and that's how San Francisco was trying to treat him. So he had a bad couple of years. 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/fantasy-football-metrics-that-matter-torrey-smiths-awful-draw-the-last-2-years

In Philly,  he was realistically their third option,  so he didn't get a lot of run (and dropped 4 out of 60-something balls), but he came through in the clutch.  Philly may not have pulled it off without him. 

Just think of him as Ginn 2.0. He's largely a one-trick pony who might still have something close to that 4.36 speed (Philly fans did say that he was still fast), meant only to make defenses pay in the event that they disrespect his speed. Plus, he's a great locker room guy who has a couple of rings.  And,  correct me if I'm wrong,  his salary is not even guaranteed this year.  

Now of course I ask myself why him as opposed to Mike Wallace? Well,  Norv Turner knows Mike Wallace, and I'm fairly sure that Ron and Marty didn't summarily decide that Wallace wasn't what they were looking for.  There must have been at least one compelling reason why they didn't explore him further.  That being said,  Smith can provide the same thing that Wallace can, and Ginn did,  which is speed with so-so hands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 Just try to be objective.

Golden Tate $31,000,000 $6,200,000
Terrelle Pryor $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Travis Benjamin $24,000,000 $6,000,000
Mike Wallace $11,500,000 $5,750,000
Amari Cooper $22,663,120 $5,665,780
Jeremy Maclin $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Brandon Marshall $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Markus Wheaton $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Julian Edelman $11,000,000 $5,500,000
Seth Roberts $10,485,000 $5,242,500
Torrey Smith $15,000,000 $5,000,000
Rishard Matthews $15,000,000 $5,000,000
Sammy Watkins $19,935,603 $4,983,901
Mike Williams $19,750,056 $4,937,514
Adam Thielen $19,246,000 $4,811,500
Jermaine Kearse $13,500,000 $4,500,000
Brandon LaFell $9,000,000 $4,500,000
John Ross $17,115,864 $4,278,966
Cordarrelle Patterson $8,500,000 $4,250,000
Terrance Williams $17,000,000 $4,250,000
Kevin White $16,563,048 $4,140,762
Eric Decker $4,000,000 $4,000,000
Chris Hogan $12,000,000 $4,000,000
Jarius Wright $14,800,000 $3,700,000
Ted Ginn $11,000,000 $3,666,667

https://overthecap.com/position/wide-receiver

 

Now if you're going to tell me that 29 year old Smith ain't in this class of receiver,  then there's no reason to talk. 

 He is nobody's WR1, and that's how San Francisco was trying to treat him. So he had a bad couple of years. 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/fantasy-football-metrics-that-matter-torrey-smiths-awful-draw-the-last-2-years

In Philly,  he was realistically their third option,  so he didn't get a lot of run (and dropped 4 out of 60-something balls), but he came through in the clutch.  Philly may not have pulled it off without him. 

Just think of him as Ginn 2.0. He's largely a one-trick pony who might still have something close to that 4.36 speed (Philly fans did say that he was still fast), meant only to make defenses pay in the event that they disrespect his speed. Plus, he's a great locker room guy who has a couple of rings.  And,  correct me if I'm wrong,  his salary is not even guaranteed this year.  

Now of course I ask myself why him as opposed to Mike Wallace? Well,  Norv Turner knows Mike Wallace, and I'm fairly sure that Ron and Marty didn't summarily decide that Wallace wasn't what they were looking for.  There must have been at least one compelling reason why they didn't explore him further.  That being said,  Smith can provide the same thing that Wallace can, and Ginn did,  which is speed with so-so hands. 

Thanks Dawg.  I would add that Smith's contract is unguaranteed (originally 3 years, $15m with $500k guaranteed)--so he would consider a pay cut for guaranteed money and an extension.  If not, we have no dead money for cutting him.  It is a good contract for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually have to come to like the move, provided they move on from Shepherd and look to add another piece at the position.

 

It really ensures we aren't in a disaster scenario as was so common throughout the previous regime where we put all our chips on one draft night opportunity to fix a position and when it doesn't work out we head into the season starting players who wouldnt make most team's rosters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Thanks Dawg.  I would add that Smith's contract is unguaranteed (originally 3 years, $15m with $500k guaranteed)--so he would consider a pay cut for guaranteed money and an extension.  If not, we have no dead money for cutting him.  It is a good contract for us.

This is key, Hurney likes the player and knows he can work that contract to significantly reduce the cap hit... would expect that to be announced very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is when it leaves you 19 mil to spend (5  of it will go to rookies) and still have holes at

WR (Smith is a deep slot #3), LG (Center Kalil missing 50% of games last 2 seasons and retiring after this season), FS, CB, NT, DE, RB, and a backup QB 

 

 

 

If we cut Shepard itd make me feel better.

 

If not, we have 4 Slot WR on the roster (Smith, Shepard, Bryd, Samuel) with a ton of holes and little to spend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was concerned initially by reports Phi was cutting him.  Then I was worried about the remaining money and current salary on his deal.

Now that all the info is out regarding his guaranteed money being paid and we have 0 cap hit if we cut him, Worley for Smith was a good deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you feel a significant loss from Worley, I don't see how this can be considered a bad deal. Does anyone think he could have fetched anything better than a 5th round pick from another team?

It's entirely possible Torrey is  just an insurance policy in the event we cant do any better at the position in free agency. Essentially just a way to hedge our bets and make sure we got the veteran presence Rivera mentioned. 

Ideally I would still like us try to improve the position in free agency. If we can land a better talent than Torrey then we can offer him a more cap friendly deal to us or let him walk with 0 consequence. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...