Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pagano interviews w Panthers


ellis

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm honestly kind of surprised he's interviewing, but he didn't exactly get a lot of action on the interview circuit this year and as far as I know, he's not up for either of the remaining jobs

He didn’t do great in Indianapolis but he was also hamstrung with a meddling owner in Irsay and one of the worst GM’s in modern history in Ryan Grigson. Not a HC, but would gladly take him as a defensive assistant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frash.exe said:

we can always make chuck the HC and have ron run the defense

And here's where we get tricky...

There's been some chatter before that Rivera is too paranoid to hire anybody who has the potential to replace him unless he's already friends with them and trusts that they won't try to supplant him.

Valid? Don't know, but I suppose you could make a case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

No question RR is a nice guy. What would you suggest was the reason he handed the reigns of the defensive play calling to Washington ( a great DL but inexperienced as a playcaller) after they'd been working together for eight years? Why couldn't he not see that going with someone more experienced would have been a better decision?

And DC's being promoted to HC's has nothing to do with ego or lack thereof. If that were the case, no one Belicheck's protegees would've been hired as HCs.

that's not ego at all man, that's called trust. He trusted in Washington, and unfortunately Washington didn't deliver. He trusted McDermott and he trusted Wilks - they delivered. Would you call that ego? I am thinking you just used the wrong word here....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

that's not ego at all man, that's called trust. He trusted in Washington, and unfortunately Washington didn't deliver. He trusted McDermott and he trusted Wilks - they delivered. Would you call that ego? I am thinking you just used the wrong word here....

I'll agree with you on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Michael McLeod is a Cane apparently..
    • He's going way overboard. I mean, men talk this way all the time. Bryce seems like a fine young man. But he's been piss poor at his job. I wish that I could be piss poor at mine---wait, no I don't---and get paid millions.  The thing is, I've supported Bryce in the past, but he doesn't seem to be the type of QB that what I've heard Chris Canty refer to as a "force multiplier." He can't make good players great, he needs great players to make him good. He's not going to pull out a win when times get tough (at least he hasn't), but he becomes good when there is essentially nothing to play for. After trying to give Bryce the benefit of the doubt, and waiting for the light switch to stay on, I'm tired of waiting. I've seen what I need to see, and it ain't pretty. So excuse me for calling Bryce, "pussified" for not being more aggressive in his pursuit of down field plays. He appears to just not have it in him. I'm sorry, Bryce and all Bryce Stans. He's still got to go though.
    • Yeah me too. We should have taken him. He was a much better bet than most of what you find that far down. He might have been 5 stars coming out of high school, I don’t know. Just that he was highly thought of. His college career didn’t get off to a great start and he ended up on a bad team with bad protection. But you could watch him and see what he had. I don’t see a way he doesn’t have a long career as a #2, at worst. 
×
×
  • Create New...