Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where does Panther’s fan base rank...


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Makes sense based on their criteria. The better question is whether those measures accurately reflect the quality of your fan base.  I really don't know or actually care. I am a Panther fan and love yelling with 60000 others at the stadium on game day.  I hope folks say our stadium is a tough place to get a win. And I hope I can keep doing my part to make that so. Who cares about social equity? I want to just be the one talking poo to their fans on the way out instead of the other way around. Imagine a Dallas fan saying....  But we are the best fanbase...  .   as we whoop that butt in the playoffs at our house. Pedestrian, I know ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TNPanther said:

Social equity?? Sounds like something HR would say.

I’ll take 16 though. Not bad for a small market team.

Keep in mind he is largely using this model to evaluate a fanbase on it's marketing and economic impact. So, in that regard social media plays a pretty big role because it is so key to a lot of modern marketing.

Take these rankings with a grain of salt because most of these articles never really explain the purpose for the guy's ranking system. It is definitely not a measure of how a fanbase OVERALL supports the team but more of a basic metric to measure which fanbases have the biggest economic impact, based a few categories. It's interesting but the sports media has dramatically oversold it as a tool to measure how "good" or "hardcore" or whatever that a fanbase is. Trying to come up with a tangible ranking system for something like that would be extremely difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...