Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In a 4-3, Does Shaq move inside or stay at the WLB


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Should be MLB in a 3-3-5. I have no idea how he would do with a green dot. Anyone would look weak in comparison to Luke. Hopefully he justifies his contract. it certainly is something to keep an eye on as it developes throughout the offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

And if Shaq does become our new MLB - how does he do filling the shoes of Luke?
He got a 4 yr $54 deal and has studied under Luke for 5 years now. 

I think he stays outside BUT he may end up being our play/signal caller from that spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like him outside. Would prefer a 250+ pound inside linebacker that won't get washed out by Guards. 

Love Luke and he is an all-time great. Maybe the best all-around MLB ever. His only real problem was not being able to shed blocks consistently. Not his fault. 235 pounds taking on 300 pounds is a physical mismatch. 

Let the OLBs and DBs cover. I want a MLB that will knock an OG on his tail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We get caught up too often in 4-3 and 3-4 talk, when the Panthers are likely to spend a lot of time with just one LB on the field, that being Shaq. 

Yeah, 1st down and short yardage, he plays the middle. But in nickle and dime packages, it won't matter, other than to say he'll be on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...