Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

It's a good idea, but it's not apples to apples.  Go back and look at how New York was turning away people who went tot he hospital, and how the shutdown of other types of access to medicine has led to deaths not directly COVID.

Why was NYC being compared to other countries?  Why choose the grossly mismanaged epicenter of the American outbreak when clearly NYC was the statistical outlier in all the data.  Why not places like Alaska, North Dakota, Oregon, Nebraska, South Carolina etc...?  Simple, it was for maximum shock effect.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Why was NYC being compared to other countries?  Why choose the grossly mismanaged epicenter of the American outbreak when clearly NYC was the statistical outlier in all the data.  Why not places like Alaska, North Dakota, Oregon, Nebraska, South Carolina etc...?  Simple, it was for maximum shock effect.

Probably due to density of the population compared to land size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

It's a good idea, but it's not apples to apples.  Go back and look at how New York was turning away people who went tot he hospital, and how the shutdown of other types of access to medicine has led to deaths not directly COVID.

Could and should of course be done per state. 

Was it such a big problem it could show up and potentially add thousands of cases? Was it for the whole NY or just NYC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Probably due to density of the population compared to land size.

True, which if you think of it that way would be even more terrorizing.  So for someone scanning this article would see one city with death rates higher than other countries.  I'm sure that would scare the absolute poo out of someone that didn't know that NYC's numbers were completely out of whack compared to the rest of America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Man, that's great!

New York and New Jersey have green-lighted Pro teams to return to their facilities!  This was a MAJOR hurdle.  The League wasn't going to allow players back into facilities until all 32 teams were allowed by their respective state officials due to a perceived competitive advantage.

I'm not sure how many other states still have restrictions on Pro facilities, but NY/NJ giving the go ahead is huge.  I figured they would be one, if not the last, to do so.

NY/NJ Pro Teams Permitted Back Into Facilities

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 45catfan said:

New York and New Jersey alone count for nearly 1/3 of the total National deaths.  Take that into account and the rest of the country is not nearly as bad off as the it would seem.  NYC botched its response horrendously from the beginning and the optics in the National death count as a result looks a lot more ominous than had NYC handled their part better.

 

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

New York and New Jersey have green-lighted Pro teams to return to their facilities!  This was a MAJOR hurdle.  The League wasn't going to allow players back into facilities until all 32 teams were allowed by their respective state officials due to a perceived competitive advantage.

I'm not sure how many other states still have restrictions on Pro facilities, but NY/NJ giving the go ahead is huge.  I figured they would be one, if not the last, to do so.

NY/NJ Pro Teams Permitted Back Into Facilities

You hit the nail on the head a few pages ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

CMS will open 2 weeks earlier cause of RNC...

My wife is a teacher in CMS. The week when the convention is here will he shifted to schooling/work from home as well. Fingers crossed the convention goes somewhere else. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Tbe said:

This is excellent.

The bottom line is NYC’s historical average weekly death rate. 
 

Red is this year. 

72F25622-EE51-4989-808C-FAB51C560465.jpeg

To follow up on my own post, the nytimes had another article on this. Basically, they have no idea how many of these extra deaths are Covid and how many were other causes. They think most were Covid, but a good number were heart attacks or other issues.

It is too soon to know the precise causes of death for New Yorkers in this period. Although many of the deaths not currently attributed to coronavirus may represent an undercount of the outbreak’s direct toll, the broader effects of the pandemic might have also increased deaths indirectly. Throughout the city, emergency rooms have been overcrowded, ambulance response has been slowed, and many residents might have been reluctant to seek medical care because of fears of contracting the virus. Hospitals around the country have reported reductions in admission for heart attacks, one sign that some people may be dying at home from ailments they would survive during more normal times.”

 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/27/upshot/coronavirus-deaths-new-york-city.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tbe said:

To follow up on my own post, the nytimes had another article on this. Basically, they have no idea how many of these extra deaths are Covid and how many were other causes. They think most were Covid, but a good number were heart attacks or other issues.

It is too soon to know the precise causes of death for New Yorkers in this period. Although many of the deaths not currently attributed to coronavirus may represent an undercount of the outbreak’s direct toll, the broader effects of the pandemic might have also increased deaths indirectly. Throughout the city, emergency rooms have been overcrowded, ambulance response has been slowed, and many residents might have been reluctant to seek medical care because of fears of contracting the virus. Hospitals around the country have reported reductions in admission for heart attacks, one sign that some people may be dying at home from ailments they would survive during more normal times.”

 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/27/upshot/coronavirus-deaths-new-york-city.html

CNN had several segments early on dedicated to how New York was preparing for the rush of COVID patients.  It wasn't just people "being hesitant to go to the doctor."  People were literally trying to go to the hospital and were being turned away if it didn't seem like COVID.  Some needed beds, but the hospital didn't want to "waste" beds for regular patients, so some people were sent home to be in their own bed and were given transmitters that were connected to the hospital with a button to press if they got in distress.

You can't simply do a body count in New York and have it be accurate.  Not when they were doing stuff like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

CNN had several segments early on dedicated to how New York was preparing for the rush of COVID patients.  It wasn't just people "being hesitant to go to the doctor."  People were literally trying to go to the hospital and were being turned away if it didn't seem like COVID.  Some needed beds, but the hospital didn't want to "waste" beds for regular patients, so some people were sent home to be in their own bed and were given transmitters that were connected to the hospital with a button to press if they got in distress.

You can't simply do a body count in New York and have it be accurate.  Not when they were doing stuff like that.

Go to hospital...get sent home because it's not virus enough...die at home. Virus related death.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
    • Look at what the Bears have done with Caleb Williams, drafting playmaking WR's and TE's and making it easier for him to operate the offense. Conception is perfect for what the offense needs (speed and someone who can make defenders miss) and as today, April 11th, I think he's the pick @19 
×
×
  • Create New...