Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you take #18, #26, and a 5th for #7?

saX man

By saX man,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

saX man Mentor

saX man

Posted
Posted

The value charts show this is right around the correct value. 

In addition, the Dolphins have a big need for an OT and getting to #7 after Herbert/Tua could net them the top OT of their choosing in the draft. 

What could we get?

I call this scheme: The Tiger King:

18. K'lavon Chaisson DE LSU

26. Justin Jefferson WR LSU

38. Lloyd Cushenberry III C LSU

69. Clyde Edwards-Helaire RB LSU

Trade Up: Saahdiq Charles LT LSU (He handled Marlon Davidson while they triple teamed Derrick Brown)

113. Thaddeus Moss TE LSU

tiger-king.jpg?crop=0px,0px,1000px,560px

In the spirit of being a 2020 mock, let's add in this guy!

uw15xboshgiqjri8ptxt.jpg

THEN! In a year, Burrow gets jealous.  All of his best buds are in Charlotte.

Getting along, doing some amazing stuff.

Joe, Lloyd, Justin, Thad, Saahdiq. They hit him up, tell him to request a trade.  We land Burrow in 2021.

We find ourselves beyond the pandemic.

We become legends.

Kunu returns.

But is destroyed by the Annunaki. 

And Donnie doesn't shut the f*ck up.

And we get the rug back.

El fin.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheProcess Rising Star

TheProcess

Posted
Posted

This is a trade down scenario I like.

Maybe the Raiders get desperate to move up for a QB?  Add next years 3rd to puck #7 for picks 12 and 19

Raiders move to 7 for their QB

Panthers get Kinlaw at 12, and an OT at 19, maybe Jones or Jackson

12- Kinlaw

19- Jones or Jackson

38- Cushenberry

69- Dugger

113- Moss

5th round - Tanner Muse or Collin Johnson. Muse is a hybrid LB/S who has potential to be much better than his draft position. Johnson is a 6' 6" WR with a huge wing span, and strong hands. He isn't much of a YAC guy, or a speed guy which are the Knicks on him. He is a guy who can get you some first downs, but more importantly a redzone target, something this team needs. He and Moss fix that issue

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted

Why does everyone want Cushenberry at 38? He’s not close to Jenkins or McCoy we’re last year. The interior OL are not the same as last year. Taking Cushenberry at 38 is bad value, really bad. We should have ignored Little and gone McCoy/Evans to solidify C/G/future RT if needed and gone T this year. There’s way too much love for interior guys this year who aren’t as good as the past two year’s of prospects.

Take them in the 3rd and 4th, but any C/G prospect at 38 to me is a bad reach especially considering the other D/WR talent that will be available. Take a DT at 38 if we don’t go brown or CB or WR. Any CB or WR we take at 38 is someone in other years that is a 1st rounder, maybe even a mid first rounder. Take a C/G there and you are getting a 3rd rounder the last two years.

Again, we aren’t competing this year regardless of what we hear. We need to draft the deeper positions and go BPA otherwise we will just keep spinning having less talent than the competing teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stbugs Grand Master

stbugs

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Two first round picks would be hard to pass on. However, CB and DT would need to be addressed super early...

I’m not a fan of trading down for Kinlaw. With 7 and 38, we should be able to get the top CB or DT and another really solid one at the other position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riverboat Ron Mentor

Riverboat Ron

Posted
Posted

Honestly better than walterfootball having us trade back like 3 times to #21 getting like 2 extra 3rd's and a couple 4th's. On top of that we skip Simmons, Brown and trade back handing the Bucs Andrew Thomas. After all that we get Kenneth Murray and no extra 2nd round picks but we'd apparently do it because we suck and need players more than quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      Most hated teams

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      After Bountygate and the information that came out on the Saints owners shielding pedophile priests in New Orleans it will forever be the Saints numero uno for me. FUG THE SAINTS! I hope this is just the beginning of a long term period of suffering for that shitty organization run by even shittier human beings. #2.Pats/Belicheat #3. Falcons (Mike Vick years then Matt Ryan/Julio running it up) Ryan pooping his pants and 28-3 def makes my bad days always better just thinking of those. #4 Pretty much any franchise fan base thats obnoxious Steelers, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Giants, Cowboys, etc.
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • mav1234
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By mav1234 · Posted

      Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...