Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SB Nation The Panthers Collapse


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

SB Nation puts out some great content and they have an ongoing series called collapse where they chronicle the collapse of some of the best teams into obscurity. They did a really solid job giving a quick 15 minute summary of it all. Worth a watch if you want to feel more depressed about what could have been. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching this pisses me off in so many ways. It’s so many people to blame for this. We had an opportunity to become a consistent winner and blew it in every way imagineable. I hope that a business minded owner that was profit and respect can bring at least one SB to the team. If they can’t I feel the past few decades have been bad enough once you get to that 30th year mark and no SB Win just 2 appearances of self implosion don’t do it for me. At that point he might as well move the team to bring in more revenue because the fan base down there is horrid. I live in DC now but the first 14 years of my life between SC and NC show me that y’all care for nothing outside of college sports and its a shame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont really think this is a good video

they talk about the "setup for a dynasty" and casually omit olsen, stewart, johnson, davis, and kalil were already towards the end of their primes during that run. 

saying it's a dynast implies that the panthers had a lot of young talent ready to take over which was clearly not true. Not including trai turner and luke, look at the roster of guys who were under 26. There aren't a lot of players there that are any good. Maybe daryl williams could have been better if not for injuries, but there is nothing on the bench there. ironically, kony ealy probably would have been super bowl mvp if they had pulled off the win. 

that team was carried by a group of veterans that just peaked at the right time. there was no dynasty in the making there as long as ron and co were still in charge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

i dont really think this is a good video

they talk about the "setup for a dynasty" and casually omit olsen, stewart, johnson, davis, and kalil were already towards the end of their primes during that run. 

saying it's a dynast implies that the panthers had a lot of young talent ready to take over which was clearly not true. Not including trai turner and luke, look at the roster of guys who were under 26. There aren't a lot of players there that are any good. Maybe daryl williams could have been better if not for injuries, but there is nothing on the bench there. ironically, kony ealy probably would have been super bowl mvp if they had pulled off the win. 

that team was carried by a group of veterans that just peaked at the right time. there was no dynasty in the making there as long as ron and co were still in charge. 

I disagree, a dynasty implies that you have a franchise capable of building for the future(like the Steelers which Richardson tried to emulate and Tepper's former franchise). We had a mix of experience and talent in 2015 and we just never were able to stock our coffers with talent after that. That culminated in what is now likely the least talented roster in the history of the franchise.

The most upsetting and depressing part of this slide is that it spanned multiple owners and multiple GM's. So, at the end of the day you kind of have to look at Rivera. For all of Richardson, Tepper, Gettleman and Hurney's obvious failures, Ron was the one constant during that slide.

We peaked at the right time and we couldn't capitalize when we did. I often and will probably forever wonder if we had gotten the calls in the SB or Gano hadn't missed that kick in 2016 if we wouldn't be looking at a different outcome entirely now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Oher’s injury was really the event that started the collapse. We had ignored LT since pushing out Gross. Finally we rolled the dice and landed a good LT. His injury hurt immediately and then forced us to find a replacement. We know how that went. Bad contract on a bad player that really set us back. We followed that up with hanging on to TD and Olsen too long. Switched to a 3-4 when you have a HOF caliber middle LB???  Then the Cam injuries obviously sealed the deal. 

new owner. New coach. New faces. The GM will be the last domino to fall and then it will be a completely new era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...