Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

brees is trash


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

payton pulling him out of the game on critical downs is unprecedented. i get they like that ugly fugbag taysum hill or whoever the fug but you don't take the ball out of your best player's hands unless you're no longer convinced he's your best player.

the saints won in spite of brees and in spite of a middling chargers defense repeatedly attempting to capitulate.

i'm very optimistic about our game against them. teddy can carve those DBs up and our pass rush should be able to bury the mole-faced turd. he's on his way out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, hepcat said:

I’m pretty sure there is a secret gay sex underworld in the NFL and taysom hill and Troy aikman are involved in it 

Even if there were, I would only care if it somehow affected someone’s on field performance. Who you blow on your own time is nothing I care about. Having said that, I would not bet money against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Drew Brees is not a hinderance to the saints

 

I posted the stats a few posts up after the game last night, similar completion, about a hundred yards off from Teddy but 3:1 td to int vs Teddys 2:1. They’ve been very similar this year. But one is deemed trash and a hinderance and the other is a clear franchise QB now. Against common foes it’s the same story. They each played three games against the same defense as each other but Teddy is 2 TDs and 2 ints in those games where Brees is 4 and 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It may not be exact science and this FO is relatively new, but it is very much likely the first couple picks will be of players we met.
    • The only other position group I could think of is ILB since Dan was there for Rodriguez and Hill Jr. pro days in Texas. It’s one of the reasons I get the feeling ILB could be the pick at 19.
    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
×
×
  • Create New...