Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucks or Saints for the Super Bowl


CanadianCat

Bucks or Saints..   

62 members have voted

  1. 1. If you had to pick, who would you rather see win the Super Bowl

    • Bucks
      57
    • Saints
      5


Recommended Posts

I don't even really hate the Bucs that much for a division rival. I hate the Aints and Falcons wayyyy more. But I also don't like Brady or when teams build these super teams and try to buy a Super Bowl like Denver did, etc. And Arians is a total douche. There's nothing really likeable about this Bucs team at all. I don't see either of them winning it or even coming all that close, but if I was forced to pick I'd still say Bucs. Aints can go fug themselves and enjoy cap hell next year with Taylor Hillsom at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

I can't imagine anyone saying they'd rather see the Saints have success.  Bucs have been irrelevant for a decade or more.  Nobody hates them.  All of a sudden they get a shot to be good for a year or two and we hate them more than the Saints?

lol

Yeah but Panthers fans have hated Brady for decades, so it kind of makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fug the Saints. Honestly I can't say I have a problem with the Buc's other than them being a division rival. Hell, I won't lie, depending on who they face if they make it to the Super Bowl, I'd likely pick them as a team to go for, something that I can't say I'd do for our other division rivals. Oh man, I just had a thought. Imagine the hype around the Super Bowl if Tom Brady and the Buc's made it and they faced off with Cam and the Patriots (assuming they can somehow overcome how poor their WR core is right now and recover from injuries elsewhere).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate Brees, Wilson, Brady, and some other people.

As much as I want Atlanta to be our rivals, I think New Orleans is that team--at least to me.  So I would let the Bucs buy their championship and pay the costs for years following.

And would that not piss Winston off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fortunately only 1 of them can even go to the Super Bowl and the Pats are likely out of it. Which means we won't get another terrible SB like Pats-Falcons where I loathe both teams. Even if Bucs or Aints make it I really can't see them winning against the Chiefs/Steelers/Ravens or whoever comes out of the AFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...