Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's the cost to move up to take Lawrence?


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

The Jets have Darnold and he's not a bad QB just on a bad team.  I would imagine that the Jets would be willing to listen if the price is right.  They could use a couple extra picks to turn things around.  Especially if Lawrence says he doesn't want to play for the Jets. 

I'm not a fan of trading draft picks for one player but for the sake of a discussion (argument) what would be the cost.

There's a matrix out there that puts values on picks. (Attention all you draft gurus)  Say we draft at our current draft position at #6.  What realistically would it cost us if we chose to try and trade for Lawrence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Darnold is terrible and the jets won’t move off that pick unless they get Mahomes in return

I suspect that they won't move off Lawrence too but I think Darnold would fair much better on a more sound team.  

I was wondering what the 6th spot and additional picks based off the matrix what it would cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Sam Darnold sucks and Trevor's gonna be a jet. We have like a 5% of getting fields if the stars align. I really think Zach Wilsons gonna be the guy

I will be good with that. At least he can throw more than ten yards in the air unlike our current qb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...