Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is MLB still a huge need?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Either way, let's be real about the defense.

I feel fairly certain that if our quarterback wasn't such a huge issue, the overriding topic of discussion would be the fact that our defense just made Drew Lock look amazing.

It really wasn't "the defense" as much as it was Rasul Douglas. He's played about as well as you can expect a mid-season trash heap get to play for most of the year, but he was straight trash today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

It’s still a need but the biggest need is QB

Yep. Shaq, Carter and Chinn aren’t our biggest defensive weakness. CB is. Even S isn’t as bad as CB. Definitely think a top CB would be our biggest impact. Douglas hasn’t looked all that good lately either so two CBs might be warranted. OL no doubt and TE even. If Samuel isn’t resigned WR could be key as well. Brady needs 3 WRs more than a TE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It really wasn't "the defense" as much as it was Rasul Douglas. He's played about as well as you can expect a mid-season trash heap get to play for most of the year, but he was straight trash today.

Can't put all the blame on Douglas. Run defense wasn't that great either.

Throw in that the Broncos weren't even playing their starting left tackle but we didn't exactly put the fear of God in Lock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Anyone else waiting on Luke to come back and save us next year?   Probably not, but one can dream.

Like I have said many times before....I don't think it's impossible but definitely unlikely. The fact he's remained in a role with the Panthers and we've seen a few other players make comebacks a year or two after retiring leaves the door open. But it's different for a WR or TE to make a comeback, who can limit their snaps and contact. A MLB of Luke's caliber would be on the field a ton and be making a lot of contact. Guy like Luke isn't going to come back to play a few snaps or cover punts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daniel Jeremiah's top 50 players heading into the Combine.  Lol at the people still pining for Styles.  Dude will be LONG gone before our slot as I noted he would be.  Go ahead a keep drafting him at #19 if y'all want to keep ruining/making unrealistic mock drafts.   https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-s-top-50-2026-nfl-draft-prospect-rankings-2-0
    • Kmet is better than just 'meh'.   Mayer took a back seat to Bowers and is another TE that would relish a chance to start again.  Sanders, Temble and Evans is a better group of TEs than we've fielded during the Ian Thomas era, but it's far from stacked.  That's the problem, our TE room has sucked for so long now that  being 'better than crap' is apparently good enough--which it is not.
    • Why? Feels like we got a whole TE crew of almost Kmets. Loveland surpassed Kmet easy and relegated Kmet to Tremble like stats. Kmet’s decent years were because of volume. Kmet had over 90 targets twice in his career. Tremble’s career high in targets is 37. Tremble could produce Kmet numbers with the same volume so why would you ever go for Kmet? Loveland or Bowers type studs, go for it. Meh TEs, we’ve got plenty.
×
×
  • Create New...