Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk about Darnold


Jaxel

Recommended Posts

Yes, this topic has come up before, but having seen us drop out of range for a top QB (unless we give up the farm), I think he would be a viable option to build around with out giving up much.

A couple of points -

Darnold was higher rated coming out of college than both Fields and Wilson. He has struggled, but I think it's fair to say that working with Gase, whose track record is less stellar than, say, Rivera's - whom some say ruined Newton's career - doesn't give us much of a picture of his potential.

Darnold is still only 23, has a lot of potential, and still cheap. Darnold is younger now that Burrow, who many fans would love to have right now, has more arm talent and with coaching can develop better decisions making.

Lastly, a second or 3rd round pick is a much more reasonable gamble, than say a giving a up a one next year to move up. If it doesn't work out, you can still try next year, and you could come away with a cornerstone defensive player like Parsons, or a great OT like Slater 

In short, if the Jets go with a QB, take a chance, trade for Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A second would be too high IMO. He might be a player to consider if the QBs we want aren’t there. Grab a good LT and try to get Darnold for a 3rd, C in the second and extend Moton. If would give him the best line he has has plus weapons in CMC, Moore, Anderson, and any FAs we sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would absolutely give up a 3rd round pick for Darnold. But....I think the Jets are going to draft Sewell and have an all-pro caliber OL and develop Darnold with a different coach. They’re at the bottom of the league in sacks allowed.

Darnold has a better arm than everyone in this class other than Lawrence. Get him out of NY and with a capable supporting cast and I think he’s a playoff capable QB. So..if the opportunity is there to trade for him I would absolutely do that and let him compete with TB for the starting spot. Then spend the first round pick on another position we need like MLB, CB, TE. Coming out of the draft with Parsons, Farley, or Pitts and Darnold for a 3rd would be a win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would we give up anything for this guy?  I do get it, his coaching has been awful.  NO DOUBT.  But man, watch his decision making.  He makes some really sketchy decisions at times.  I'd say you could coach that out of him - perhaps - but he's been doing stuff like that since college.

Would I give up a CONDITIONAL 2022 pick?  Yea, I might.  If he makes the team, we give up a 6th, if he starts half or more of our games, a 3rd.  That's the only way I'd touch him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unicar15 said:

I would absolutely give up a 3rd round pick for Darnold. But....I think the Jets are going to draft Sewell and have an all-pro caliber OL and develop Darnold with a different coach. They’re at the bottom of the league in sacks allowed.

Darnold has a better arm than everyone in this class other than Lawrence. Get him out of NY and with a capable supporting cast and I think he’s a playoff capable QB. So..if the opportunity is there to trade for him I would absolutely do that and let him compete with TB for the starting spot. Then spend the first round pick on another position we need like MLB, CB, TE. Coming out of the draft with Parsons, Farley, or Pitts and Darnold for a 3rd would be a win.

Better arm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're gonna kick the tires on any current NFL QB, my pick is Carr.

Dude is seriously slept on and Gruden really, really wants him gone for whatever reason. Absolutely can win a ring with him.

That said, I'd rather take the faller from Lance, Fields or Wilson (my current order.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NAS said:

Worth kicking the tires but only if he is released. I wouldn’t trade for him.

That's not going to happen until after the draft so you have to decide whether Darnold is your target and draft accordingly.  If we win on Sunday this might be the best option for QB. 

I think Darnold would thrive in this system.  He'll have plenty of weapons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, NAS said:

Worth kicking the tires but only if he is released. I wouldn’t trade for him.

Somebody will trade for him. If an nfl team traded for Rosen, no way Darnold goes long enough to get released. Redskins, colts, patriots... Someone will trade for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he were released and just out there on the free agent market with a low, low price tag, sure. 

Actually trade for him? Would you buy a relatively new car that had been driven around wildly by someone who wasn't just a bad driver, but who had apparently driven it with the intention of damaging it to the point that someone was going to have to buy them a new one? Would you pay full market value for it?

He might make a good reclamation project, but I'm just not sure he's worth what the Kelly Blue Book says right now, if you catch the metaphor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...