Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 QBs in the top 4?


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

With the top 5 set in the draft order it really looks like the top 3 QBs could go in the top 4.

Jags draft Trevor 

Jets - I guess they could build around Darnold but I just don't see it.  You don't tank that hard to not take a QB.  Wilson the favorite?

Miami - I could see them going with a non-QB.  Sewell or Chase.  Could even trade down. Outside chance they could take another QB.

Atlanta - If Fields is there I can't see how they pass.  I guess they could try to win now with Ryan but how often do you get a chance to draft a QB like that.  Seems too perfect for them.

At this point I'm worried we might have to trade up some to take Lance.  

Jones and/or Trask might be more in play than a lot of thought going into this.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, t96 said:

If Jets pass on Fields and Dolphins want to stick with Tua, I’m definitely trading up to 3 for Fields, don’t even care what it takes to give up.

Not sure if the Dolphins budge from 3 if Sewell is in their lap.

Would be a lot like Washington last year with Chase Young

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

If Jets pass on Fields and Dolphins want to stick with Tua, I’m definitely trading up to 3 for Fields, don’t even care what it takes to give up.

This. We are in a great spot to trade up without it crippling us for years to come. If you have a guy you like, that you feel can be your franchise QB for years to come, you absolutely go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

With the top 5 set in the draft order it really looks like the top 3 QBs could go in the top 4.

Jags draft Trevor 

Jets - I guess they could build around Darnold but I just don't see it.  You don't tank that hard to not take a QB.  Wilson the favorite?

Miami - I could see them going with a non-QB.  Sewell or Chase.  Could even trade down. Outside chance they could take another QB.

Atlanta - If Fields is there I can't see how they pass.  I guess they could try to win now with Ryan but how often do you get a chance to draft a QB like that.  Seems too perfect for them.

At this point I'm worried we might have to trade up some to take Lance.  

Jones and/or Trask might be more in play than a lot of thought going into this.

 

 

 

Atl doesn't pass on Fields. Even though they still have Ryan, the writing is on the wall for him. His time is coming to an end. They will set up for the next 10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This. We are in a great spot to trade up without it crippling us for years to come. If you have a guy you like, that you feel can be your franchise QB for years to come, you absolutely go for it.

Oh yea? Tell me the last time a trade like that worked out in favor of the team trading up? Look at recent drafts and all the "franchise Qbs" that are currently playing only a few of them were drafted in the top 10. You don't need to mortgage the future to find your Qb if anything it hurts you more than it helps.

"The teams that have a quarterback picked in the Top 5 on their roster (the Browns, Dolphins, Bengals, Jets, Rams, Cardinals, Bears, Lions, Eagles, Pats, and Falcons) have a combined record of 67-87-2 this season."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...