Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers to be 'aggressive' in pursuit of potential Deshaun Watson trade

TylerDurden

By TylerDurden,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, incamwetrust1 said:

All you guys keep saying to include our best player in Brian Burns in a trade for a qb who plays like cam did in his prime and we all saw how that ended. Keep the picks keep Burns because I remember von Miller beating the panthers in the superbowl.  Watson has maybe 3 more years playing the way he does before his body starts to break down from all the scrambling around and highlight runs while getting trucked in the process. So yes keep picks like I said and Burns and keep getting pressure on the qb and who knows maybe burns can be our von miller. KEEP BURNS 

Lmao what? Watson is not remotely the same kind of runner that Cam was. 
 

We lost SB 50 because the NFL rigged the game for Manning to get his retirement trophy. On top of Ron not giving Remmers any help. 
 

Burns is a stud but he is also the most expendable and the likely target the Texans would want in return. 
 

You attract Watson with CMC, DJ Moore, Robby Anderson, maybe the return of Curtis Samuel. 
 

You don’t attract Watson by ridding yourself of CMC, his potential #1 WR in DJ, and then still possibly lose his next #1-2 in Curtis Samuel to FA. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

Multiple headshots on Cam not called. The Cotchery catch on the biggest momentum play of the game. Denver offsides on two missed field goals not called. The biggest game of the year and refs can’t call a fair game. Yeah I call horseshit when I see it. 
 

We made our share of mistakes but if you can’t see the bias in that game then that’s on you bro.

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

If anyone has to go it would and should be Burns. We can generate a pass rush by committee and bring in specialists. Can’t replace the best RB in the league and the best safety we’ve had in years.

i would much rather sell CMC and his salary. burns will likely have twice as many productive years as CMC due to their respective positions.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

i would much rather sell CMC and his salary. burns will likely have twice as many productive years as CMC due to their respective positions.

I mean that’s a fair point. But you would be trading him and then looking for his replacement and we will probably not have a 1st round pick to use.

Which I guess you’d bring back Davis. CMC isn’t just another back though. He’s an LT lite for us in what he brings to the table. Great runner, excellent receiver, great blocker and keeps the defense honest. If we don’t have him then that’s like serving Watson steak and potatoes without any steak. 

If you trade CMC, then would pay top dollar to retain Curtis Samuel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DamnItJake! Grand Master

DamnItJake!

Posted
Posted (edited)

We offer TB, Paradis, Boston, Slye, next years 1st and a life time of free subscription to Sweet Caroline!!! I just dont think offering the farm for him is worth it... we have to many needs.. I think Stafford  is more realistic but I think we should stay away from him cuz of his injuries!! I think we should go BPA at 8 and possibly trade backup for Mac Jones I think he is like Rothburger.. just not as stout .. Jones is growing on me

Edited by DamnItJake!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

I mean that’s a fair point. But you would be trading him and then looking for his replacement and we will probably not have a 1st round pick to use.

Which I guess you’d bring back Davis. CMC isn’t just another back though. He’s an LT lite for us in what he brings to the table. Great runner, excellent receiver, great blocker and keeps the defense honest. If we don’t have him then that’s like serving Watson steak and potatoes without any steak. 

If you trade CMC, then would pay top dollar to retain Curtis Samuel?

Its not extremely replace a running back. Stop it.

And for all the great things CMC can do its not gonna get you the wins you need to make the playoffs. Thats just the truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, incamwetrust1 said:

U guys are too funny. Trade burns or dj? For a qb who plays like cam did granted not as good as cam. Keep picks and draft a qb on rookie pay scale. U guys really want a cry baby qb who wants out when things don't go her way. Time to wake up. 

Cam and Watson don’t have similar games. 
 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tepper's Chest Hair Contributor

Tepper's Chest Hair

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I don't recall them winning a SB and in spite of having the best DT all time have a medicore defense.

Great point.

If you don't win a superbowl you are a failure.

If keeping 3 first round picks instead of trading for Watson doesn't get the Panthers a superbowl win, then it was the wrong move.

(Did I do it right?)

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, incamwetrust1 said:

They dont? Both aren't dual threat qbs? We watching the same watson right?

Steve Young and Cam Newton didn't have the same game. 

Vick and Cam didn't have the same game. 

Vick and Rodgers don't have the same game. 

and the opposite end of the spectrum Peyton Manning and Teddy didn't play the same game. 

Just because Watson can run and Cam can run....doesn't make them similar players 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      He didn't actually make the playoffs. We had several opportunities to clinch on our own and crapped the bed. We had to wait for Atlanta to win to get us in. We had the tie breaker in a poo division that had 3 teams finish 8-9.  If you go back and look at the games we played, we weren't a dominant offensive team under him as an OC. We beat the Jets 13-7 and barely beat the packers after they failed to convert multiple red zone trips. We relied heavily on converting 4th downs. DC was also extremely slow at recognizing trends in game and was really lacking with clock management.  Was there progress this year? Yes. But most of it was on the defensive side of the ball. Our offense was stagnant with a couple of exceptions. Any improvement from Bryce was minimal and he kept insisting on XL over Coker, and even RB distribution instead of going with the hot hand.  He may be building something, but I don't think we've seen enough to know what that is. It could go either direction. If he insists on being OC, then without a noticeable improvement, yes he needs to be on the hot seat like any OC would. The more jobs you take on the more you have to be judged on. I think he would have a longer leash if he hired a true OC and just focused in being HC.   
    • SOJA
      Panthers who are NOT a-holes

      By SOJA · Posted

      zero percent suprised Luke is a nice guy irl, have never heard anything differently from anyone that's met him.  I have heard mixed reports on Smitty I know one guy on here got to know Deangelo Williams and J stew pretty well back in the day when they used to host events and he said they were nice iirc  I can't imagine Jordan gross is a bad hang, he's hilarious 
    • PanthersATL
      Panthers who are NOT a-holes

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      Ran across this bit of fun. As seen on https://www.thesportinggent.com/blogs/dispatches/front-porch-musings-field-ethos-journal (a blog for outdoors gear and clothing)    
×
×
  • Create New...