Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rotoworld: Teddy is done in Carolina

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

glitchh8 Contributor

glitchh8

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, bobcat91 said:

No it doesn't when we are talking about the NFL. Great players in college dont always translate. Im not saying he's a bad qb and I really like him.  But not for 3 #1s, several #2s and 2 defensive starters. No, he isn't worth that

Watson is a 3 pipes and a snort dream, people just need to let go of that goofy idea!

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillaCamNewton Community Regular

KillaCamNewton

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Relevance?

he made a point that when you have a chance to grab a legitimate MVP QB you have to do it. you cant just say youre gonna build your roster first and then get one later, you arent always going to have a chance to do that. the reason its relevant is because hes absolutely correct, you can have holes in your roster but if you have an MVP caliber Qb youre always gonna be at the dance

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
On 08/02/2021 at 12:36 AM, FuFuLamePoo said:

Yeah with fuging Evans, Godwin, Gronk, Miller, a top 5 OL, and vastly improved defense. Watson was being held back by the worst defense in the league and personnel decisions within his organization are being made by a pastor.

It's crazy how people can continue to question Brady.

He's won SEVEN Super Bowls. We might never win one.

He's significantly better than Watson - thats just the facts of the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
On 2/8/2021 at 12:56 AM, Panthers8969 said:

Tbt to all the guys on here that thought he was good bc of his 5-0 record on the saints! Zero football knowledge 

After I actually went and watched those 5 games and realized Teddy was carried by a potent Saints running game and Michael Thomas bailing Teddy out with miraculous wizardry catches, I knew it wouldn’t end well. I’m on record many times last offseason saying Teddy was no better than Kyle Allen for a much more expensive price. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I do think we are working ourselves into a position where we simply won't be able to roll with Teddy next year.  The whole team sport thing doesn't work that well when your starting QB knows a franchise doesn't want him. 

I think the end result will be us forcing our own hand and trading a poo ton to move up in the draft to get a QB.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I do think we are working ourselves into a position where we simply won't be able to roll with Teddy next year.  The whole team sport thing doesn't work that well when your starting QB knows a franchise doesn't want him. 

I think the end result will be us forcing our own hand and trading a poo ton to move up in the draft to get a QB.  

There are too many options for us to fail at replacing teddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

There are too many options for us to fail at replacing teddy. 

Are there?  

There is the draft? But we aren't sitting in a safe position to get one of the main 4.  We will need to move up.  Which is fine but I think we are going to work ourselves into a desperate position where a team takes us for a lot simply because we won't be able to roll with the status quo. 

Outside of a mega deal to get Watson (longshot)....we likely are just swapping band-aid QBs on par w/ Teddy and tying up more pointless money IMO.   I personally don't want any QB not named Watson that is out there.  Is there really a point to bringing those dudes in?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, CRA said:

Are there?  

There is the draft? But we aren't sitting in a safe position to get one of the main 4.  We will need to move up.  Which is fine but I think we are going to work ourselves into a desperate position where a team takes us for a lot simply because we won't be able to roll with the status quo. 

Outside of a mega deal to get Watson (longshot)....we likely are just swapping band-aid QBs on par w/ Teddy and tying up more pointless money IMO.   I personally don't want any QB not named Watson that is out there.  Is there really a point to bringing those dudes in?  

your mind is made up it appears. There are many options at play for us. Just going to have to let it all play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CanadianCat
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • Panthering
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By Panthering · Posted

      This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...