Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per Joe Person: players Panthers would like to re-sign

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

saX man Mentor

saX man

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Curtis elected to hit free agency--bet it does not work out for him.

The last 2 receiver classes (and this coming one) have been ridiculously talented and translated quite well.  There's an over abundance.  On the flipside, there's only a few guys truly ahead of him in the FA class being Allen Robinson, TY Hilton, & (maybe) Corey Davis.

I think he still gets a nice payday but the market is trending to one where you can go young and find guys in the draft in the top 3 rounds.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted

The list (minus the summaries):

1. OT Taylor Moton, unrestricted free agent
2. WR Curtis Samuel, unrestricted free agent
3. DL Efe Obada, restricted free agent
4. G John Miller, unrestricted free agent
5. TE Chris Manhertz, unrestricted free agent
6. OT Trent Scott, restricted free agent
7. G Chris Reed, unrestricted free agent
8. LS J.J. Jansen, unrestricted free agent
9. LB Julian Stanford, unrestricted free agent
10. WR Brandon Zylstra, restricted free agent
11. RB Mike Davis, unrestricted free agent
12. WR Keith Kirkwood, restricted free agent
13. CB Rasul Douglas, unrestricted free agent
14. CB Corn Elder, unrestricted free agent
15. FB Alex Armah, unrestricted free agent
16. WR Pharoh Cooper, unrestricted free agent
17. LB Adarius Taylor, unrestricted free agent
18. OL Tyler Larsen, unrestricted free agent
19. OL Michael Schofield, unrestricted free agent
20. OT Russell Okung, unrestricted free agent
21. LB Tahir Whitehead, unrestricted free agent

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, saX man said:

The last 2 receiver classes (and this coming one) have been ridiculously talented and translated quite well.  There's an over abundance.  On the flipside, there's only a few guys truly ahead of him in the FA class being Allen Robinson, TY Hilton, & (maybe) Corey Davis.

I think he still gets a nice payday but the market is trending to one where you can go young and find guys in the draft in the top 3 rounds.  

It will be interesting.  If you can get a good talent on a third round contract for four years, is he worth 10 times that amount?  I do not think he will get more than about $5-6m.  We probably lowballed him, saving the $$ for Moton.  We will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

Im very close to the same, but dont have Efa as a top 3. 

In fact every single player on the list Id have back except Whitehead, if youre talking minimum types deal. Need depth.

I thought COrn played well, he shocked me in making the team. But like Douglaus as the year got older, play fell off badly. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panther Believer Apprentice

Panther Believer

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Im very close to the same, but dont have Efa as a top 3. 

In fact every single player on the list Id have back except Whitehead, if youre talking minimum types deal. Need depth.

I thought COrn played well, he shocked me in making the team. But like Douglaus as the year got older, play fell off badly. 

I really liked Corn too. If we can get someone like Ifeatu Melifonwu or Greg Newsome in the 3rd round to play boundary CB that would be amazing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Obada and Scott as RFAs makes them very easy to keep. Miller should be relatively cheap. This off-season based on the article is what last off-season should have been. Thank god, we need to stop spending stupidly when we are rebuilding.

I think youre wrong about the easy part. Since both were UDFAs, if we tender them "as same round" cheaper one, we get nothing if they sign else where. I think its 3.XX for second rounder tender, compared to 2.X for original.  Miller should be around 4 million per, someone needs to play RG. He did fine, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...