Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN Predicts Watson to be the Panthers starter in 2021


Big Sexy
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

Not historically bud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChibCU said:

You list no empirical data to arrive at these conclusions. You also willfully omit the fact that drafted players have a relatively minimal cap hit as opposed to veteran, top-tier QBs.

1/10.

What kind of empirical data would adequately represent values that are subjective in nature?

I agree he didn't give any support to his claim but I fail to see where empiricism plays a significant role. How do you empirically validate things like football IQ, instincts, leadership, etc? You could rely on stats but unless you have a standard and exhaustive means of analytics that doesn't mean much either. Example, RB is supposed to run through the A gap but Star closes the gap forcing the runner to look outside where he meets the DE, who do you credit with that tackle? What if on tape it looks like it was designed to go to the A gap but was indeed a counter, can you even make such a determination without knowing the play that was called? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

A scenario where the Texans hold on to Watson long enough for most or all of the potential suitors to go in other directions, then decide they want to trade him, isn't really that hard to imagine.

I don't think they'll have any issue getting a premium trade haul for him either way. But if they wait until after the draft they're going to forego the opportunity to secure a replacement and there's gonna be a lot of booing and probably some paper bags over heads at Texans' home games next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think they'll have any issue getting a premium trade haul for him either way. But if they wait until after the draft they're going to forego the opportunity to secure a replacement and there's gonna be a lot of booing and probably some paper bags over heads at Texans' home games next year.

I'd lay pretty good odds that the bags and the booing are gonna happen anyway.

I can't imagine being a Texans fan right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think they'll have any issue getting a premium trade haul for him either way. But if they wait until after the draft they're going to forego the opportunity to secure a replacement and there's gonna be a lot of booing and probably some paper bags over heads at Texans' home games next year.

I could see them waiting until draft day. Have a deal in place with whoever and have them pick a player for them. Then have that team send over their next 3 1’s so essentially they’d be getting 4 1’s

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

The exact QB in question is on a 4-12 team. A team who didn't have a first round pick 2 of the 3 years since he was drafted and is lacking in talent elsewhere.  So either he isn't elite enough or your mantra isn't valid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Mage said:

True, but just based on everything I have heard and read, I do not get the impression that McNair would ever even consider firing Easterby.  The Texans are Easterby's team and McNair's the guy empowering him.

And that being the case, there really isn't anything that can be done under that power structure that will change Watson's mind.  Best-case scenario is he says eff it and agrees to play, but now you're talking about a QB who really doesn't want to be there but just plays anyway.  

IMO as crazy as it sounds.  When you consider the Texans lack of immediate draft capital or cap space.  And consider that they will almost certainly suck even with Watson this year.  I actually think you could argue trading Watson would be the best move for their rebuild.  You will get a great player or two and a lot of picks.  But they are not winning anything with Watson in the next 2 years. 

yeah, I think it is largely an ego thing.  I think he realizes Easterby is problematic.  You think David Tepper gonna listen to a player going public about how he is running a franchise into the ground?   Player could be 100% right.   Don't think an owner wants to take that type L publicly.   The, I don't know how to run my business L but the player does. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

AN ELITE QB IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN 2-3 FIRST ROUND PICKS

Out of interest, what was that elite QB's record last year when surrounded by a sub-par team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, I think it is largely an ego thing.  I think he realizes Easterby is problematic.  You think David Tepper gonna listen to a player going public about how he is running a franchise into the ground?   Player could be 100% right.   Don't think an owner wants to take that type L publicly.   The, I don't know how to run my business L but the player does. 

The NFL has never had a shortage of people with small brains and large egos.

When such people get involved in decision making, things go wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's a pipedream. He's a 25 year old MVP caliber QB. His trade value ain't gonna drop.

The number of potential bidders might.

In that scenario though, and even accepting the premise that his value could drop, that wouldn't necessarily mean that the Texans would lower their demands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...