Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade up for Wilson

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I'd trade T2G for Darnold but I think 2 is going to be too rich for us to move. I expect they'll want at least 3 1sts or maybe 2 1st 2 2nds and a 3rd or 2.

for Sam Darnold? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I'd trade T2G for Darnold but I think 2 is going to be too rich for us to move. I expect they'll want at least 3 1sts or maybe 2 1st 2 2nds and a 3rd or 2.

According to the article, we trade CMC, plus picks #8, and #39.

"If they could somehow convince the Jets to take Christian McCaffrey, the No. 8 pick and a little sweetener for the No. 2 pick, the Panthers would come out as a massive winner. This is not any hatred toward one of our favorite NFL players in CMC, who is an absolute stud on and off the field, but paying a running back $16 million per year isn't a winning strategy."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leotiger Enthusiast

Leotiger

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

I wouldn't even trade back for Wilson.... cement in his shoes.

Just curious how you came to that conclusion? I’ve watched him play a lot his feet work needs alittle work but cement in his shoes ? You might be thinking of mac Jones 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leotiger Enthusiast

Leotiger

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

Sheesh, just offer the Jags four #1s and Teddy Bridgewater for their pick. 

At this point, what's the harm. If you are going to trade away the future, might as well get the pick of the litter.

I agree .. if we going all in for qb .... might as well ....

 

I will say khan will not trade this pic,,. Tlaw on any team jumps the team evaluation a bunch meaning $$$$$$.... the marketability alone is worth mega bucks 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm down. I've said it before that Lawrence is by far the safest QB pick in the draft but it won't shock me a bit if Wilson ends up being the best.

What team drafts you impacts your success/career as well.

I personally think the Jags made the wrong hire once in a position to draft Lawrence.   You find yourself in position to draft golden boy....and follow it up with hiring a controversy plagued college coach in Urban Meyer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...