Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Explain this to me..Saints and the cap


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

It isnt voodoo. It isn't rocket science. 

They have done what they've done for a decade and just restructured contracts to convert base pay to league minimum and spread the signing bonus out over the length of the deal. 

Void years arent anything new. They've been around forever, hell we used them on Matt Kalil and recently on Paradis.

Thats it, there's literally nothing else to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Every year this question is asked and every year Loomis works his voodoo and makes it happen. If they have a major setback this year and finish under 500, look for them to use 2022 to dump a ton of their cap problems. 

You just said it.... its every year because they just keep pushing more and more money to future years cap space think of it as buying on credit.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They restructured Hill, which will push about $8mil into future dead money. 
 

They cut about $40mil in salary, including starters (LB Kwon Alexander, WR Sanders,  CB Jenkins, TE Cook, LG Eaton, P Morstead. 
 

They also “officially” still have Brees on the roster. Once he leaves they get hit with an additional $10.4mil hit, so even though they are “only” $11 mil in the hole, they need $5mil+ for cushion throughout the year and another $8mil for rookies. 
 

So they are still about $35mil in the red for ‘21, plus they’ve restructured contracts to push money to future years. And they have no franchise QB.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the Saints do it is the way we did it with CMC and Shaq and every other team does it in the NFL.  The take a players current large salary, change it to a signing bonus and then they can spread it out over a 5 year period.  It lessens the cap hit for the current year but increases it for subsequent years.  It a player only has 1 or 2 years left on his current contract it mean they usually add voidable years at the end of the contract.  This ensures that their will always be dead money that hits the cap in the future because when the years void, which they will,  the remaining signing bonus hits the cap as dead money unless they sign a new contract.  

Every team does this, it's just the Saints do it every year and with multiple players a year.  It means they will never walk into a offseason with a lot of cap space and they will always have dead money on there books but they will always have room to add a least some players every year.  This only really hurts if you have multiple bad drafts in a row and don't have cheap rookies you can rely on to at least give you some playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, bababoey said:

The way the Saints do it is the way we did it with CMC and Shaq and every other team does it in the NFL.  The take a players current large salary, change it to a signing bonus and then they can spread it out over a 5 year period.  It lessens the cap hit for the current year but increases it for subsequent years.  It a player only has 1 or 2 years left on his current contract it mean they usually add voidable years at the end of the contract.  This ensures that their will always be dead money that hits the cap in the future because when the years void, which they will,  the remaining signing bonus hits the cap as dead money unless they sign a new contract.  

Every team does this, it's just the Saints do it every year and with multiple players a year.  It means they will never walk into a offseason with a lot of cap space and they will always have dead money on there books but they will always have room to add a least some players every year.  This only really hurts if you have multiple bad drafts in a row and don't have cheap rookies you can rely on to at least give you some playing time.

so trading 3 #1's & multiple other picks plus young players on rookie deals for a single player is probably not a good idea?

Edited by Scott12345
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • there is one common denominator in the 2003 & 2015 Carolina Panthers teams they both had ELITE top tier Qb play.  it would require a MVP type of season from Bryce Young to have the same type of success that Jake Delhomme had in  2003 & or Cam Newton in 2015 & lead this team to a SuperBowl is this going to happen or is there any reason to believe Bryce Young is capable of playing similar to Jake Delhomme in 2003 or Cam Newton in 2015 ? well no there is no absolutely NO reason whatsoever to believe that this is going to happen in 2026 ..just saying 
    • I'd actually like to see Cherelus get a fair shot to win the job in camp. Wallace is decent in drop zone coverage, but he gets abused in the play action game and is often times out of position in the run game. It might just be me, but I swear every time I watch Wallace play, I see multiple plays a game were it looks like he's just trying to be blocked. Watching Cherelus last year he at least looked like he was trying to hit someone on every play. Wallace plays like a LB who doesn't trust what he sees and it makes him passive and cautious versus Cherelus who regardless of if his decision is right or wrong goes at it 100%. 
    • Agreed.  Hasn’t happened to me either, but I feel very strongly about it.  That’s not just one of the worst things a woman could do to a man, it’s a power inherent to only women and is one of the worst things a HUMAN being can do to another.  A man can’t “hide” a pregnancy or maternity.  It’s impossible.  And that sucks for anyone that has to go through that. I always got a weird vibe off her and just found her very unlikeable.  Annoying even.  I’ve always been good at reading people and there was just something about her to me that was off-putting, somewhere under the surface.  And here we are…  she is despicable.
×
×
  • Create New...