Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Samuel to Washington


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

Good for him to get paid, that said, I think this will hurt his career if anything in ron riveras system.

I can't see how it helps it. But with what he's getting paid I personally wouldn't mind wasting away on a roster somewhere for 3 years.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Shocker said:

5,137 crybaby posts in a row.  Quite an achievement 

  Of course. If it was that simple, you would surely have no problem tearing my points to shreds. But since they are usually right, you stick to this cop out because you can’t refute my obviously biased posts. When someone of your limited knowledge falls back on that, I just take the compliment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Per Schefter

I don't think too many of us were expecting him back at this point, but still...

“Washington tried to trade for Samuel last season, a quest that started in the summer and lasted until the trade deadline, ESPN reported Tuesday. The person who blocked the move: Panthers general manager Marty Hurney, who now serves as Washington's senior vice president of player personnel.”

 

Hurney, the gift that keeps giving. fug you, Hurney. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People pissed about this Hurney decision to keep Curtis instead of trade him need to go back to last offseason and remember what Curtis was THEN.  Prior to 2020, the dude had 100 catches for 1200 yards . . . in his CAREER.  He was catching at a rate of 55%.

Curtis was not good at that point, he was potential.  I suspect we were offered something in the 4th round range for him.

I wish him only the best, but I'm glad we didn't feel a need to pay him that kind of money.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrianS said:

People pissed about this Hurney decision to keep Curtis instead of trade him need to go back to last offseason and remember what Curtis was THEN.  Prior to 2020, the dude had 100 catches for 1200 yards . . . in his CAREER.  He was catching at a rate of 55%.

Curtis was not good at that point, he was potential.  I suspect we were offered something in the 4th round range for him.

I wish him only the best, but I'm glad we didn't feel a need to pay him that kind of money.

A 4th is probably more than the compensation pick will be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...