Joe Person: Panthers don't love other QB's besides Lawrence and Wilson

[BurnNChinn]

Interesting? I guess if all clear we are not giving up on Watson?

[Varking]

It serves the Panthers no good for this stuff to be put out there if it’s true. I believe it’s a smokescreen. 

[USC/panthers_11]

48 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Different regime same as the old. Always reactionary instead of being proactive. If we pass on Fields or Lance I’m done. 

If we draft either Fields or Lance I'm done.

[AceBoogie]

31 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Interesting? I guess if all clear we are not giving up on Watson?

It’s been the same guy pushing the same agenda. Means nothing. 

[OldhamA]

1 hour ago, Growl said:

if this turns out to be true I would worry that ownership or the Deep Scouting side has the same awful ethos that you'll find on this forum, where the same 10 posters are always suggesting we wait until the next class when the perfect prospect may fall to us whereever were drafting

unless you're picking at #1, the guy you're taking has question marks, and those question marks will look a certain way relative to each position

you don't pass on talented players just because you're waiting for the perfect prospect perfect scenario unicorn that never comes 

 

Likewise, you don't pass on talented players if the QB that everyone thinks you desperately need to draft has too many question marks raised by your scouts for you to be comfortable with him.

I'm all for taking late round fliers on Lance, Newman, Mond, Mills etc - all guys with technical flaws that you MAY be able to coach out of them if your QB Coach is good enough (and has the time).

I'm not ok with taking guys at #8 (or hell, trading UP for guys) that aren't bonafide generational QB prospects. 

[LinvilleGorge]

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Likewise, you don't pass on talented players if the QB that everyone thinks you desperately need to draft has too many question marks raised by your scouts for you to be comfortable with him.

I'm all for taking late round fliers on Lance, Newman, Mond, Mills etc - all guys with technical flaws that you MAY be able to coach out of them if your QB Coach is good enough (and has the time).

I'm not ok with taking guys at #8 (or hell, trading UP for guys) that aren't bonafide generational QB prospects. 

Delusion.

[Arizona Dude]

1 hour ago, BurnNChinn said:

Interesting? I guess if all clear we are not giving up on Watson?

Former Panther and retired player hopes for the best for a current young buck. Where exactly are you seeing ANY indication "if all clear" ( which wont even be the case, but lets play) we are not giving up on Watson. 

You reach too much respectfully.

[BurnNChinn]

1 minute ago, Arizona Dude said:

Former Panther and retired player hopes for the best for a current young buck. Where exactly are you seeing ANY indication "if all clear" ( which wont even be the case, but lets play) we are not giving up on Watson. 

You reach too much respectfully.

Maybe learn how to read? I said I guess if he is all clear at some point would we still look at trading for him. Damn newb

[Arizona Dude]

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

Maybe learn how to read? I said I guess if he is all clear at some point would we still look at trading for him. Damn newb

The fact you even shared it shows your reach. 

The further fact you had to defend yourself with a personal insult is even more telling. 

[d-dave]

I love the smoke screens that happen during the draft season!

If Lane is there at 8, I'm pretty sure we're sprinting up there to take him.

If we don't, there are some other incredible talents at OT and CB which would greatly improve our franchise.

I'm good either way.  Unless they draft a RB or something...

[BurnNChinn]

2 minutes ago, Arizona Dude said:

The fact you even shared it shows your reach. 

The further fact you had to defend yourself with a personal insult is even more telling. 

Bye Felicia 

[CanePantherHornet]

I've said all along that I didn't want them to just draft whoever was left at 8 because we need a QB. That's usually how stuff like EJ Manuel, Christian Ponder, and even Mitch Trubisky happen.

[Growl]

11 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I'm not ok with taking guys at #8 (or hell, trading UP for guys) that aren't bonafide generational QB prospects. 

then you're a bad poster with bad opinions and no understanding of how the draft works

[Sean Payton's Vicodin]

14 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Likewise, you don't pass on talented players if the QB that everyone thinks you desperately need to draft has too many question marks raised by your scouts for you to be comfortable with him.

I'm all for taking late round fliers on Lance, Newman, Mond, Mills etc - all guys with technical flaws that you MAY be able to coach out of them if your QB Coach is good enough (and has the time).

I'm not ok with taking guys at #8 (or hell, trading UP for guys) that aren't bonafide generational QB prospects. 

guys we cant trade up for mahommes at 10. hes not a GENERATIONAL talent. lets just stick with alex smith and StACk dA ROsTa

-OldhamA, genius chiefs GM, 2017

Edited March 29, 2021 by Sean Payton's Vicodin