Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tony Pauline: Panthers sleeper team to trade for Sam Darnold


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

if we lost out on watson, fields, all the good ones...

i wouldn't HATE a conditional mid rounder for darnold + drafting a second round QB to develop, let them duke it out while we continue to stack the team with linemen.

i don't really know what the alternative looks like at this point.

I am personally against a 2nd round QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a big Sam Darnold fan, not any more. Stats-wise hes the worst QB during the his starting era, THE WORST. Whatever happened-coaching, NYC, home-sick, Woman issues etc. Also only has one year of contract control, hes not even worth a late rounder imo. MAaaaaaaaaaaaybeeeee a 2023 7th. Hed have to agree to a one year extension. Like Teddy is better, but a even one for one is ok, I guess. I think the panthers had to pay Teddy 7.5 million today. Could talk the jets into Teddy being a better mentor for Zach than lost soul Darnold. Be doing the jets a favor....Id want at least a extra late rounder in return...

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...