Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Build a wall


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, X-TEM-X said:

How about Dyami brown in round 3 with 73th pick? It sound like a Crazy to me or nah?

He seems to be in that range as well don't know much about him though.  I'm a USC fan so I just put St. Brown, and you're presumably a UNC fan and put Brown haha. Always have to throw one of your college guys in the mock.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Double Trouble said:

He seems to be in that range as well don't know much about him though.  I'm a USC fan so I just put St. Brown, and you're presumably a UNC fan and put Brown haha. Always have to throw one of your college guys in the mock.

Ahaha Of course I did throw one guy down in Panther Mock but I wouldn't be shocked if Dyami Brown did past by 3rd or 4th round then just grab him before 5th round.

So we gotta wait and see what happen in draft night TBH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, chknwing said:

dude trade down and take the entire Alabama Oline in the 2nd/3rd.  Instant wall with chemistry.

And with picks 47 through 51 the Carolina Panthers select...

The entire offensive line, Alabama Crimson Tide.

(Jets fans boo)

Five hogmollies take the stage in lockstep, all shake Goodell's hand simultaneously (accidentally throwing him off stage) and put on one giant New Era Panthers flat bill. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tbe said:

I think we’d draft Fields if he fell, but I bet we pass on Lance. 

That would be the only scenario in which I would consider passing on either Sewell or Slater, if they are still on the board.

I'm not a Lance hater, and in the right situation he may turn out to be an amazing QB.  We are just not the right situation at this point, especially with pick 8 and huge needs at OL (almost all of it), CB, LB, TE, DT, and potentially little depth at WR. 

I'm not whining about our roster situation.  12 months ago we basically had to gut the roster to exorcise the demons of the prior regime rewarding players (our own or FAs) based on what they did a couple of seasons earlier, not what they could do next year.  Coming back from that takes time.  I'm happy for the young talent we have, and hoping I feel just as good about the 2021 draft 9 months from now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I prefer "if you build it, they will be knocked on their asses trying to get to him".

Hey Dr. Quest here, what happened to the Tinderbox?  Trump still your favorite President of all time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/7/2021 at 2:14 AM, WOW!! said:

I don't always agree with Scot but this is a no brainer.. Build a Oline and Secondary your only real hole is QB .. If Darnold falls on his face.. A QB next year comes into a good situation.  

still have room for improvement at LB and FS. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...