Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Advanced analytics on darnold


Panthers8969
 Share

Recommended Posts

Confirm that he’s booty. To everyone crying he had no OL - “Over the past three seasons Darnold has ranked 34th of 38, 21st of 37, and 28th of 38 in on-target percentage from a clean pocket

29th in deep ball accuracy last year- teddy was 28. 
 

if we wanted an early qb who never lived up to his potential, mariota would’ve been cheaper and was never this atrocious.

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/analysis/did-the-panthers-give-up-too-much-to-fix-sam-darnold/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
 

 

Edited by Panthers8969
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what people do not get-

QBs have an internal clock.  They get hit (or hurried) at 3.4 seconds after the snap (making this up) 76% of the time.  Darnold is hit or hurried 88% of the time at 3.1  seconds.  Mentally, do you think he is in the same place as a Drew Brees or a Dak Prescott--teams known for their OL play? 

The threat of pressure can be as real as the pressure itself-human nature.  It is called "defense mode" and the amygdala in the brain sends a signal to the hippocampus, shutting normal functioning down and sending the brain into "fight, flight, or freeze" (defense) mode.  Ever get really rattled when you were ALMOST in a car accident?  Same thing.  

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He only had a clean pocket on 23 attempts, so that initial statement is a bit overstated

Jesus - that stat right there is far more telling about the Jets than anything Darnold did or did not do.  Over 14 games he only had a clean pocket for 23 throws?!?!  YIKES!  Hopefully Sam is not permanently seeing ghosts now, ala David Carr.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, joemac said:

Jesus - that stat right there is far more telling about the Jets than anything Darnold did or did not do.  Over 14 games he only had a clean pocket for 23 throws?!?!  YIKES!  Hopefully Sam is not permanently seeing ghosts now, ala David Carr.

He misread that graphic. 23 deep throws (21+ yards). Not total attempts from a clean pocket (though that number is likely below average as well)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...