Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Player Don’t You Want?


Troys99x4
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Rashawn Slater. NFL evaluators don't even know if he can sustain play at left tackle and think he needs moved inside. 

"With your number 8 pick, that could be used to find a slam dunk player, Rashawn Slater left.... GUARD!!!"

Do yourself a favor.  Look up Jordan Gross's measurable s, his scouting report and then compare to Slater.  Let me know how that works out for you. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they were picked at 8? I'd say Jones, Fields and Horn off the top of my head.

A lot of people love Horn for some reason, but he relies too much on beating guys at the line of scrimmage. I've seen some evaluators push him to a 2nd round talent. If we trade back from 8 I'm open to taking him later, but I don't see him as a top 10 player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the Surtain logic. If we trade down to like 15ish and he's still there it's a no brainer. But he isn't a top ten pick. He's a mid first rounder in my book 

I do not want Mac Jones. 

Here's another hot take. I kinda think Zach Wilson is going to be a bust. One of these guys out of the top four is going to be and Wilson has the biggest bust potential in my book 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

Man did this bring me back to Earth on Pitts or what...

 

I’ve felt this way for a while. I saw Pitts play at Florida and I think he’s a hell of an athlete. But I would never draft a tight end 8th. More than Pitts, though — who I could at least understand — it’s a hard no on Mac Jones. Not crazy about any CB at 8. I’m realty hoping either Sewell drops and if he doesn’t and there’s no QB, we trade down and get a LT. Or Parsons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

Any Alabama player. I have nothing against Alabama, but I don't believe any of them are worth #8. Not this year. I'd be fine with several of them in the 2nd.

Absolutely no way either of them is available in the 2nd. 

I don't want Shaun Wade. Unless it's in the 4th round or so because he looked lost in the post season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

Z.Wilson do not want...

I see the Jets taking Jones...

 

I usually throw myself into the Draft process so I'm much more bullish on propects.

I haven't this year, for various reasons.

That said I just don't get the Wilson hype. He has the potential to be very good, don't get me wrong, but the fact he was in a 3 way battle for his job in the Spring and was never named Captain is startling.

As for his play on the field I think he runs a fine line between throwing up jump balls and putting the ball where it needs to be.

I LOVED Mahomes coming out because whilst he played off the cuff like Wilson / had mechanics you wouldn't teach an 8 year old QB (both arm and footwork), he was DEADLY accurate with the ball. Wilson.... not so much for me - or maybe I'm just not seeing the genius. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...