Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King: Panthers want to come out of this draft with more picks than the seven it currently holds


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8. CAROLINA. The Panthers are in an intriguing spot. Smart money says one of the five quarterbacks will still be on the board at eight, so new Panthers GM Scott Fitterer could be in the luxurious position of having three options: Picking the quarterback and giving him a comfy redshirt year behind Sam Darnold, or trading to a team desperate for, say, Justin Fields here, or taking a very solid player to continue the Carolina rebuild.

One thing I do know (and not just because Matt Rhule just spent a learning day with Jimmy Johnson, who always had a trove of picks to work with) is Carolina wants to come out of this draft with more picks than the seven it currently holds. The average team has 8.1 picks in an NFL draft, including Compensatory Picks. Over the last eight drafts, Carolina has averaged 6.3 picks per year. Knowing Rhule and Fitterer, that’s got to burn them. Particularly after trading three picks for Darnold, look for them to work to gain more April 29-May 1

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/04/18/nfl-draft-rumors-fmia-peter-king/

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Anyone outside the Panthers organization that claims to know what the team intends to do is delusional.  Those within the organization likely won't be able to say for sure until the moment of truth arrives.

I am not sure they are to that level of state secret. I suspect they are as tight lipped as most NFL front offices are around draft time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not sure they are to that level of state secret. I suspect they are as tight lipped as most NFL front offices are around draft time.

Of course the Panthers are doing their due diligence, but there are at least 7 teams in front of them at the moment.  Stand by for further developments. 

"Life is what happens while you're busy making plans."

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Of course the Panthers are doing their due diligence, but there are at least 7 teams in front of them at the moment.  Stand by for further developments. 

"Life is what happens while you're busy making plans."

Yeah, as fans we rarely know what goes on behind the war room doors. Even if we stand pat at 8, we'll likely never know about most of the deals that were offered or that we tried to make.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Anyone outside the Panthers organization that claims to know what the team intends to do is delusional.  Those within the organization likely won't be able to say for sure until the moment of truth arrives.

Right! Haha!

BREAKING NEWS!!!

NFL team would like to add more players!

STAY TUNED!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't all teams love to trade down, gather more picks and still get their "guy?"  If someone makes a good enough offer, say moving to the teens and picking up a couple more picks, I imagine the Panthers will strongly entertain that offer.  

The NFL is a QB driven league, and if one or more of the top QBs start to fall, I can bet that people will be calling anyone from the Bengals to the Panthers to shake the tree.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

All these articles about what we’d like to do in the draft all mention things that were in our hands if we handled the 2020 off-season like a true rebuild aimed at getting us the real replacement for Cam. Instead we pissed away a 3rd and 4th/5th comp picks and a chance to draft top 3. If we were at 3 and not enamored with Fields/Lance, we would have gotten the haul from SF. Would have been pretty easy to stock up on IOL with 3 3rd round picks and still get Slater/Darrisaw at 12. Having 4 first round picks the next two years would have been nice.

Instead we may be trading down to get those extra picks that were in our hands or a QB we really wanted.

NFL teams don’t manage their roster like they‘re playing Madden. Move on and get over it. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Instead we may be trading down to get those extra picks that were in our hands or a QB we really wanted.

From Albert Breer's latest MMQB (link)

Speaking of Sewell, he’s one of a number of players I’d see in play for the Panthers at No. 8. The genius of the Sam Darnold trade, by GM Scott Fitterer and coach Matt Rhule, is that it maintains the team’s flexibility to take a quarterback there while creating new flexibility not to take a quarterback with the pick. If Fields slides to No. 8, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see his slide stop there—be it via the Panthers taking him or trading the pick to someone who would. At the same time, Carolina’s in a nice spot to address its needs at corner (with a Jaycee Horn or Patrick Surtain) or tackle (with, perhaps, Sewell) and go forward with Darnold, too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...