Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To all Sewell hopefuls


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, stbugs said:

But that doesn’t mean Flowers (their LG) being traded equals taking Sewell. I’m not saying they won’t take Sewell but that this news has nothing to do with taking him.

I mean it could mean they are taking Sewell, but I seriously doubt it.

The thinking behind the Sewell talk for Miami.....

Last year in Miami

LT - Jackson

LG - Flowers

C - Karras

RG - Kindley

RT - Hunt

In the Sewell scenario after Flowers was traded, Kindley would move to LG where he played in college, and Hunt would move down to RG. They also lost Karras in FA but signed Skura.

With Sewell

LT - Jackson

LG - Kindley

C - Skura

RG - Hunt

RT - Sewell

Having Tua as a lefty puts Sewell at RT protecting the blind side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

I mean it could mean they are taking Sewell, but I seriously doubt it.

The thinking behind the Sewell talk for Miami.....

Last year in Miami

LT - Jackson

LG - Flowers

C - Karras

RG - Kindley

RT - Hunt

In the Sewell scenario after Flowers was traded, Kindley would move to LG where he played in college, and Hunt would move down to RG. They also lost Karras in FA but signed Skura.

With Sewell

LT - Jackson

LG - Kindley

C - Skura

RG - Hunt

RT - Sewell

Having Tua as a lefty puts Sewell at RT protecting the blind side.

I read on the athletic I think is that Miami is trying to come away with Chase and Etienne in the first.  That would super charge their offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

Miami is taking Chase or trading back taking Smith/Waddle!

Good question as to which the are thinking.  I think they originally traded out of 3 and then back into 6 because they were looking at receivers, and there are three marquis wideouts and Pitts available.  They didn't need the #3 pick, so they parlayed it into more picks to address more needs.

Right now they have two picks in the first (6 and 18) and four in the top 50 (add 36 and 50). 

4 hours ago, MHS831 said:

fwiw

Miami Newspaper poll:
image.thumb.png.1a61c35bfdc36ce5e5063db953e2e192.png

 

They have a chance to get one of the top WRs in some time (Chase) or Waddle.  They can get a T later.

That is pretty much inline with the consensus I have seen on their needs.  Now imagine them with another 2nd or 3rd rounder and a slightly lower first pick.  They could wind up with two new receivers and filling the other needs all by pick 50.  They would probably want any picks beyond that (for potentially moving down) in 2022.

Barring a Hurney moment, they are going to be more talented a week from now than they are today, at least on paper. 

Edited by Sgt Schultz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...