Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All aboard the Tommy Tremble bandwagon


Recommended Posts

Just now, PandaMan said:

We got 2 mf DOGS in Horn and Tremble in the words of Jalen Ramsey.    He plays with intensity, that’s for sure. Ian Thomas plays like Charmin so this will be a nice change of pace

Literally. No more automatically going down when touched with no yards after contact, Tremble already more man than Thomas could ever imagine to be lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Seems like the kind of guy I would have been pumped to land in the 5th or 6th round. Not sure I see the value in a 3rd round pick for a blocking TE/H-Back with limited pass catching ability. 

I agree. I wish we would've waited around the 4th round or so, but I'm not mad just because he wasn't given many opportunities in the passing game, but with how athletic and how high his ceiling is, I don't mind it. Glad we are just finding our identity. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Captroop said:

This is actually the pick I'm most excited about from last night. It addresses two major concerns we have this off-season:

Pass protection: Is he an elite tackle? No. Is he a complete solution? No. But with the surefire starting caliber Tackles gone, (basically since Sewell) the best we could hope to do was augment the pass protection. And it doesn't look like there's any better option for exactly that than Tremble. 

Preserve Mccaffrey: If we've learned anything, when a coach has a player like CMac at their disposal, spelling him doesn't seem to be an option in their minds. So he's going to get almost all the carries and almost all the abuse. So again the best we could hope for is an elite blocker who can help ensure he takes a lot less abuse. More lanes opening up, less getting blind-sided, this is an investment in the best running back in the game today. 

I don't see how you can look at what Tremble brings to the offense and question if he was worth a 3rd or risk him not being there in the 4th. I love this pick! 

That is actually not a bad point. As bad as we are likely to be at LT, having a nasty blocking TE could be the safety net that limits how much damage our LT situation could cause. 

Considering how likely it is that our LT is a turnstile, if we see a lot of schemed help from Tremble(or others) that would make me feel a lot better about the coaches understanding the roster situation a little better. The anti-Shula move.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

scouts have been saying for years they didn't understand why Notre Dame didn't throw to him more often. Most likely because it's Notre Dame and you Have To Play The Right Way At Notre Dame and That Means NOTRE DAME FOOTBALL or whatever dumb bullshit

when you get stuck in a role it's hard to break out of it.

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That is actually not a bad point. As bad as we are likely to be at LT, having a nasty blocking TE could be the safety net that limits how much damage our LT situation could cause. 

Considering how likely it is that our LT is a turnstile, if we see a lot of schemed help from Tremble(or others) that would make me feel a lot better about the coaches understanding the roster situation a little better. The anti-Shula move.

I said this yesterday but he’s essentially an oline pick. Also he doesn’t have bad hands. Even just a quick YouTube search of all his catches shows him making really good contested, leaping and diving catches. He’s super talented. I imagine he’ll be used in the passing game some but I wouldn’t completely count out his abilities as a pass catcher yet.

Edited by TheRumGone
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Seems like the kind of guy I would have been pumped to land in the 5th or 6th round. Not sure I see the value in a 3rd round pick for a blocking TE/H-Back with limited pass catching ability. 

I get it, we just see him as more of a complete TE than ND played him. Also have a great blocker in the backfield will help our shaky line. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

scouts have been saying for years they didn't understand why Notre Dame didn't throw to him more often. Most likely because it's Notre Dame and you Have To Play The Right Way At Notre Dame and That Means NOTRE DAME FOOTBALL or whatever dumb bullshit

when you get stuck in a role it's hard to break out of it.

 

I think the issue was he had more drops than touchdowns at Notre Dame. So he moved down the priority list when it came to throwing the ball to tight ends. Then they recruited Michael Mayer who was the number 2 TE in the country in high school and he is actually a great pass catcher. So Tremble lost the opportunity to a freshman and the freshman gave no reasons for them to look elsewhere. True freshman tight end finished the year tied for first in catches on the team, was second in yards and tied for second in TDs. And again, Tremble dropped his way out of being a target for them. 
 

But this isn’t ignore the TE is somehow Notre Dame football lol. The true freshman tight end was their second most targeted pass catcher. Tremble just gave them too many reasons to throw his way. 

Edited by Varking
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...