Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What we need to see from Sammy D in OTAs


 Share

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, BrianS said:

How did they exceed expectations?  They regressed!  In 2019 we ranked 19th in total yards, and 20th in total points.  In 2020, we ranked 22nd in total yards and 24th in total points!  To me, we *massively* underachieved on offense.  Remember, 2019 was Kyle Allen at QB.

Because it was a total rebuild.  Everyone thought we would be getting the #1 pick in 2021 so you can't possibly compare 2020 to 2019.

Edited by NAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I love that people think that now he's out of the 'pressure cooker' of the NY market he'll have more space to breathe.

Half the fan base is ready to jump down his throat the first time he throws an INT because he's not the particular brand of 2021 rookie that they tied their colours to. 

He knows this is his make or break year if he wants to be a starting NFL QB.

Especially passing on Fields and Matt Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Ever heard of a salary cap? Also a lot of us pay good coin towards the product that they waltz out there. So in essence, damn right it's our money.

 

When you willingly purchase something it's no longer your money.  Buying a car doesn't give you say in the company. Too funny.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Been thinking a lot about this, but the one thing I want to see is him stepping into the leadership role here. He needs to make this his team...his offense, and the rest of the team needs to start looking at him as a leader right away.

You mean a Cam style leader, very vocal and "Alpha?" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You mean a Cam style leader, very vocal and "Alpha?" 

Vocal isn't necessary based on history of successful QBs. The good ones generally haven't been terribly so. Most are more concerned with preparation than appearing to be alpha.

The overly alpha thing hasn't actually worked took well.

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moo Daeng said:

Vocal isn't necessary based on history of successful QBs. The good ones generally haven't been.

I would certainly disagree with that. Brady and Manning are two examples of very vocal on field leaders. 

But not all elite or good QB's are vocal leaders, that I would agree with. Some are "lead by example" types. That was where I departed from some of the criticisms thrown at Fields as a prospect. The fact he was quiet or reserved in interviews didn't make me think he couldn't be a leader at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Trainwreck said:

We’ll be like the Browns when they passed on Mahomes and Watson. 

Yeah, Myles Garrett was a beast, but I bet they would do it differently if they could re-pick. At least they didn't screw up as bad as the bears with Trubinsky.  Just please try to refrain from likening us to the frikken Browns in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, stbugs said:

Whatever dude, feel free to read better next time. First of all, we still spent 3 picks on him. If we didn’t we would have had an extra 6th and 4th (2022). Also, we never regained the 2nd rounder next year so yes, we have lost something. Second, where did I complain about what we gave up? I mean if you are going to get all high and mighty you might want to again actually read well. I was just pointing out that you can’t just say Horn + Darnold = Fields without including the 3 picks that we gave up. Add the 3 picks and it’s a very valid comparison. I don’t care that we passed on Fields or traded for Darnold, I just wanted a Not Teddy with potential since we have weapons.

Please try to understand a post before you reply with another witty response that falls flat.

Not to even mention the potential 100M or more in salary that Darnold will make the next 5 years as opposed to a real rookie QB like Fields. Which makes exercising that 5th year option having no upside and all risk. Any comparison has to assume they play at a similar level. The initial trade was a little much but not too bad. But guaranteeing another 19M for no reason is. It’s Darnold/Horn - Fields/ Moton/Moore new deals. I’m having a hard time using basic math to make on any of that logical  financial sense. Maybe you will have better luck

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

 

When you willingly purchase something it's no longer your money.  Buying a car doesn't give you say in the company. Too funny.

Not really the point. My money helps pay his salary though. So the statement that "You're not paying his salary" would be incorrect. Of course I don't have a say where the money goes but I sure as hell can bitch about how they spend it. I'll let my my boy big Tepp decide if they allocated my money correctly.

Edited by SmittysLawnGuy
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, NAS said:

Because it was a total rebuild.  Everyone thought we would be getting the #1 pick in 2021 so you can't possibly compare 2020 to 2019.

But not because of our offense!  We were looking like a top pick because our defense in 2019 was historically bad and old!  We lost our best DB to free agency and our HoF MLB retired. 

We were a middle of the pack offense in 2019.  Everyone thought that with the pieces we had, with Joe Brady at the controls and TB5 upgrading what we saw from Kyle Allen we'd be a better offense.  We were slightly worse.  All because TB5 was anti-clutch.

Again, what specific things on our offense grade out as below average?  The only one I can come up with is the TE room, and that may be underselling them a little.  Our skill positions are among the best in the league QB aside.  Our line is average to possibly above average.

Everything about our offense SCREAMS "Give us a franchise QB and we will light this league up!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You mean a Cam style leader, very vocal and "Alpha?" 

No...and he doesn't have to be to be good and effective. There's quite a few different types of effective leader.  Cam's, to a degree, was unique to him. Same with Jake. I think both were great. Sammy will find his own voice...or maybe he has found it.

If I had to guess, I would see Sam as being more closely resembling Rhule. The kind @MHS831 calls the Shepherd dog kind of leader.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

No...and he doesn't have to be to be good and effective. There's quite a few different types of effective leader.  Cam's, to a degree, was unique to him. Same with Jake. I think both were great. I see Sam as being more closely resembling Rhule. The kind @MHS831 calls the Shepherd dog kind of leader.

 

Okay, wasn't sure what your bar was for that. I don't personally believe everyone has to be a Peyton Manning type to be successful in the NFL(look at Aaron Rodgers, for instance).

Apparently Rhule is VERY vocal and animated, so I am not sure I see that in Darnold. He seems to be a "by example type."

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are also QBs who appear reserved, cautious in front of the media, and entirely different in the locker room, a player his teammates respect. QBs have different styles, but achieve the same leadership qualities that make a group of players a team.

I’ve never heard, or read, Sam complaining, or even caring what the media writes about him, it was always about his team.

If you don’t think playing in the L.A. fishbowl, with ESPN headquarters down the street from SC, and personalities like Colin Cowherd, etc. showing up for practices hasn’t prepared him for not being intimidated by the big stage...don’t know what to tell you.  He also played for a University that is the only CFB blue blood on the West coast.  They’ve been groom from the moment they step on campus, on how to deal with the media.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Okay, wasn't sure what your bar was for that. I don't personally believe everyone has to be a Peyton Manning type to be successful in the NFL(look at Aaron Rodgers, for instance).

Apparently Rhule is VERY vocal and animated, so I am not sure I see that in Darnold. He seems to be a "by example type."

Yeah I think you are right. I think Sam is really charismatic and very positive, which will be a big bonus for him, but I also see him as expecting a lot from himself and working to getting the best out of himself as well as everyone around him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you know. Apparently winning is secondary to Bryce’s development. Same as it has been.     In a way it may be good because we didn’t need to make the playoffs and extend this fuging charade about Bryce being the guy. Better in the long run if he gets enough rope to hang himself with. 
    • Dave Canales is not the problem. He just isn't 
    • I know DC is overthinking this and he really needs to be OC or HC, but how do you call plays with a QB that in all reality, shouldn't be starting. Bryce is wildly inconsistent. He should lean on Rico and the run game, but if he does and wins, it presents a false narrative that Bryce is better than he is and he's potentially stuck with him for another season. If he doesn't, he looks incompetent as a play caller, but it exposes the ugly side of his QB situation that he really does need a QB that can execute at minimum a basic NFL offense with some decent consistency.  I feel a little sorry for the guy because he was anchored with Young this season and even more weight with Dalton getting a 2 year deal. He has very little to work with at the most important position on his team and it's not his doing. The trade deadline was approaching and it was plainly obvious we needed to do something but we didn't for whatever reason.  I don't think he's a complete bonehead and don't know what he's supposed to do. Win games and potentially keep Bryce or lose them by putting the weight on Bryce's shoulders. Either he succeeds or fails.  As a coach I know you're supposed to play to win the game, but do you win now at the ultimate long term detriment to your team and locker room? 
×
×
  • Create New...