Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"There will be repercussions"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

I can't find much I like about Rhule or Tepper. 

He better get to the Super Bowl by the end of year 5.

*looks confused*

Because you can't stand coaches who impose discipline and hold their players accountable?

Seriously, you might not like Rhule, but *this* is the incident you are highlighting as what you don't like about him?

Substitute any other coach in the league into this situation and let the story stay the same and tell me what your complaint is.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catsfan69 said:

Tepper definitely. Can't stand him. Would much rather have had local ownership. 

Rhule, if 0 was I hate him and 10 was I think he is the perfect coach for us I put him at 5 or 6.

There's just something off there on top of moves like today, cutting the safety for making a football play. (I can't cut a kid for making a play even if over aggressive in the first week. If it had been during the regular season? Better argument) I'm also still not sold on his staff. 

Lots of things.

I simply do not agree with you. 

You seem to have this idea of a utopia, local 2nd ownership , and a coach never doing anything that you wouldn't do. 

We don't live in a universe such as that. 

Edited by pantherclaw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

I simply do not agree with you. 

You seem to have this idea of a perfect coach, local, and never doing anything that you wouldn't do. 

We don't live in a universe such as that. 

I wanted Robert Saleh honestly. 

Tepper, he's too involved in the wrong ways like Dan Snyder. 

Soccer should never be played in that stadium. Getting rid of people's seats many of which have been sitting there since 1996.

i don't like the idea of a stadium in South Carolina. 

So Tepper I can't stand. 

Rhule I'm open to. But for me the jury is still out. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

Tepper definitely. Can't stand him. Would much rather have had local ownership. 

Rhule, if 0 was I hate him and 10 was I think he is the perfect coach for us I put him at 5 or 6.

There's just something off there on top of moves like today, cutting the safety for making a football play. (I can't cut a kid for making a play even if over aggressive in the first week. If it had been during the regular season? Better argument) I'm also still not sold on his staff. 

Lots of things.

Yeah, cutting an undrafted rookie safety for injuring a WR during non contact practice without pads was a terrible move. Probably set us back years…

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catsfan69 said:

I wanted Robert Saleh honestly. 

Tepper, he's too involved in the wrong ways like Dan Snyder. 

Soccer should never be played in that stadium. Getting rid of people's seats many of which have been sitting there since 1996.

i don't like the idea of a stadium in South Carolina. 

So Tepper I can't stand. 

Rhule I'm open to. But for me the jury is still out. 

Surely you did not just try to equate Tepper with Dan Snyder.  That can't be what you just did, right?

The two couldn't be any more different.

And what's the problem with other events going on at BofA?  I think it's a good thing.  I'm pretty sure most folks would agree that getting more use out of your stadium is a win for the community as a whole.  No one is forcing you (or any other Panthers fan) to attend these events.  Pretty sure you'll see a stadium full of Garth Brooks and Elton John fans who are thrilled to be there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catsfan69 said:

I wanted Robert Saleh honestly. 

Tepper, he's too involved in the wrong ways like Dan Snyder. 

Soccer should never be played in that stadium. Getting rid of people's seats many of which have been sitting there since 1996.

i don't like the idea of a stadium in South Carolina. 

So Tepper I can't stand. 

Rhule I'm open to. But for me the jury is still out. 

We have no indication that Saleh is going to be a better coach than Rhule. They are likely both good coaches.

As far as no soccer in the stadium, does that mean you are in favor of raising taxes to have a soccer-only stadium built? Personally, I think it's a smart use of existing facilities. Good on Charlotte for getting a major soccer franchise.

We'll see if a stadium ends up in SC. I highly doubt it will, although the idea of it will serve as proper leverage for future negotiations.

So, what specifically has Tepper done that you can't stand? Despite what you have indicated, he has not been personally involved in personnel decisions. Sure, he's said he'd like a franchise QB and would go all out for one, but he's letting Fit and Rhule determine how that takes place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Raleigh PF said:

We have no indication that Saleh is going to be a better coach than Rhule. They are likely both good coaches.

As far as no soccer in the stadium, does that mean you are in favor of raising taxes to have a soccer-only stadium built? Personally, I think it's a smart use of existing facilities. Good on Charlotte for getting a major soccer franchise.

We'll see if a stadium ends up in SC. I highly doubt it will, although the idea of it will serve as proper leverage for future negotiations.

So, what specifically has Tepper done that you can't stand? Despite what you have indicated, he has not been personally involved in personnel decisions. Sure, he's said he'd like a franchise QB and would go all out for one, but he's letting Fit and Rhule determine how that takes place.

Soccer can be played at Memorial Stadium or UNCC.

I also don't like moving the practice facilities to SC.

The removal of the end zone seats was pure BS.

He seems to meddle in Personnel decisions more than I would like. 

Also my personal opinion is the most successful pro franchises are ones that the owner doesn't try to turn it into the highest profit margin team but one where everything is spent on people facilities and winning. I don't think Tepper is that guy. I think he's George Shinn.

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper is so night and day from Richardson.  We are lucky to have him as far as I am concerned.

Rhule is a find also and I am convinced he will find success here.  I was a little concerned last year that his coaching staff lacked in NFL experience.  And I think some of the criticism coming from Teddy was legit.  Other than that he commands respect and players like playing for him and he is not as asshole prima donna so he has that going for him.

In terms of the fight, I have to say that Anderson bringing some fire really is encouraging.  He had great numbers but seemed to coast a bit in the second half and tire of the checkdowns.  Marshall may be pushing him also.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • then why dont teams do that more if the 5th is so valuable?  If thats the case then the bills clearly value moving up 60 spots vs a 5th on a wr or whatever
    • guaranteed for injury only. I know I know he's always hurt. But if he sucks this year or misses more time this year but can pass a physical after the season we can cut him with zero $ on the books. 12.4 isn't much for a corner these days. easy decision in my view to pick up the option.
    • Historic Success Chart  (this chart is nine years old, but it shows the basic pattern of success) The numbers show us the following outline for finding consistent starters: 1st Round - OL (83%) LB (70%) TE (67%) DB (64%) QB (63%) WR (58%) RB (58%) DL (58%) 2nd Round - OL (70%) LB (55%) TE (50%) WR (49%) DB (46%) QB (27%) DL (26%) RB (25%) 3rd Round - OL (40%) TE (39%) LB (34%) DL (27%) WR (25%) DB (24%) QB (17%) RB (16%) 4th Round - DL (37%) TE (33%) OL (29%) LB (16%) WR(12%) DB (11%) RB (11%) QB (8%) 5th Round - TE (32%) DB (17%) WR (16%) OL (16%) DL (13%) RB (9%) LB (4%) QB (0%) 6th Round - TE (26%) OL (16%) DL (13%) WR (9%) DB (8%) RB (6%) LB (5%) QB (0%) 7th Round - DB (11%) OL (9%) QB (6%) WR (5%) DL (3%) LB (2%) RB (0%) TE (0%) https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2015/2/20/8072877/what-the-statistics-tell-us-about-the-draft-by-round Disclaimer:  I realize the first thing some of you will attempt to do is discredit the validity of this empirical study in an attempt to invalidate any conclusions that differ from those you have developed without any degree of exhaustive research or mild inquiry--comparative analysis, data collection, or coding, etc.  So I suppose I should apologize in advance for providing unsubstantiated and unapproved data for our casual consumption; if you'd like, I can get the address for those at Pro Football Reference who are responsible and allow you to contact them or seek compensatory damages.  If this information is still relatively accurate, the probable success rate for our WR selection yesterday should be in the 55-58% range, considering the depth of the position in this year's draft.  FUN FACTS:  For those of you wanting to double dip at WR:  The probability of starting drops in half each round from the second to fourth, and then (strangely) jumps from 12% to 16% in round 5, dropping back down to 9% in round 6...Notice the incredibly high (compared to the others) rate of success for TEs taken in rounds 5 and 6.  TEs drafted in the fifth round nearly double the chance for starting when compared to nearly every other position.  In the sixth round, the chance for TEs becoming a starter is 10% higher than the next highest position--5 times higher than a sixth round LB, for example. Statements that are related to the Panther situation based on this data: If we take a C in round 2 the chances of finding a starter are about three fourths (75%), the chances for drafting a LB in round 3 drops from more than half (55%) to a third (34%).  Finding a starting CB in the third round (opposed to the second) would drop from nearly half (46%) to a quarter (24%). If we take a LB in round 2, the chances of finding a starter are just over a half (55%).  Finding a starting CB in the third round (opposed to the second) would drop from nearly half (50%) to a quarter (24%).  Finding a starting C in the third would drop from 75% to 40%. If we take a CB in round 2, the chances of finding a starter are about 50%.  the chances of finding a starting C would drop from 75% to 40% in round 3.  The chances for drafting a LB in round 3 drops from more than half (55%) to a third (34%) So what scenario gives us the highest percentage of finding 2 players in rounds 2 and 3 that give us the highest likelihood for finding starters? Round 2: Center 75%, LB 55%, CB, 50% Round 3:  Center 40%, LB 34%, and CB 24% Other tips DAY 3:  This is when you draft the TE.  Between rounds 4-6, the percentage of finding a starter drops from 33% (rd 4) to 32% (rd. 5) to 26% (rd. 6). Recommendation: Draft your TE round 5. Round 4:  This is when you draft a Defensive Lineman.  37% chance of becoming a starter.  That is 10% higher than the third round and 24% higher than the fifth round. Round 5: The best round for drafting WR on day 3 (16% chance of starting). Round 7:  Draft a defensive back.  There is a one-in-nine chance of finding a starter--11%.  PROGNOSIS:  Based on this draft,  If we draft Center (rd 2) and ILB (rd 3) and have the best chance of producing two starters 54.5% If we draft LB (rd 2) and Center (rd. 3) the chance for producing 2 starters is 47.5%. If we draft a CB (rd 2) and LB (rd 3), the chance for producing 2 starters is 42%. If we draft a LB (rd 2) and CB (rd 3) the chance for producing 2 starters is 39.5%.* * in my opinion, based on the depth of this draft, this is probably what the Panthers will do-- At any rate, this is not law or current, but it does give you some ideas--hope you enjoy it.  
×
×
  • Create New...