Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WFT has narrowed down their list of potential new names


CanePantherHornet
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 8/19/2021 at 11:59 AM, Mr. Scot said:

It occurs to me that I'm really glad we got a name like "Panthers" because the suggestions that I'm seeing put forth for Washington mostly suck.

I admit what I'm about to say is a little silly.

An analysis of Super Bowl winners would show we'd be more successful with a name like Bankers. Teams with some sort of human mascot (Steelers, 49ers, Patriots, Packers, Cowboys, Chiefs, Buccaneers, Raiders, Redskins) dominate the list of Super Bowl winners. Teams with feline predators (Bengals, Lions, Jaguars) have traditionally struggled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/19/2021 at 10:25 AM, GOAT said:

They should've gone with Pigskins to honor their old nicknames and make it football related without crossing the line. Throwing red in front of anything seems like the wrong move if that's what this whole thing was about. My family are all Washington fans and they still call them the Redskins / Skins anyways.

 

Might as well just stick with WFT at this rate...

PETA wont like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Are you now equating best/worst rush defense with best/worst defense? Those are separate things entirely. For rush defense, depending on how you quantify it, he has been largely in the bottom third of the league his entire career as a defensive coordinator.  As you can see, aside from his one year in Denver, he has never been above 20th in yardage. Now, there is context to consider which is most coordinators choose to run on him(24th-32nd ranked in his three year in Carolina). So, if you just simply look at Y/A, it has been a relatively mixed bag. Twice a top 15 defense but twice a bottom 15 defense.  The thing the should make all this good/bad run defense a lot clearer is the right most columns. Evero's defense has always prioritized pass defense and confusing QB's. That's the core of his defensive philosophy, as has been reported relatively widely. As much as there are ample personnel issues on that side of the ball(many of which he contributes to with his below average talent evaluations) his defenses may never be truly elite in rush and pass defense unless they are stocked with defensive talent. Like....his Denver defense that he inherited was. To that point, if you look at all those rankings from the three years Fangio(of whom Evero is a noted disciple) it shows a progression of getting steadily better into the far more elite defense it is now under Vance Joseph. As far as his HC interest, recall that he was a hot commodity after Denver and that cooled significantly after his first two years here. I suppose if you count getting interviews for HC positions as a benchmark for being a good coach(most would not) then he is middle of the packish.
    • We are talking last week's playoff game, right? https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202601100car.htm?hl=en-US#all_player_offense https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/gametracker/boxscore/NFL_20260110_LAR@CAR/?hl=en-US https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/football/nfl/stats/2879581?hl=en-US
×
×
  • Create New...