Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breer at Panthers camp


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

We got a fuging squad people. Everyone being a Debbie Downer must have a miserable life at home. This is the youngest, most talented Panthers team we’ve had since at least 2015. Just stop over analyzing and enjoy the ride. Personally I think we’re gonna shock the world this year.

Let’s fuging get it!!

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, joemac said:

We got a fuging squad people. Everyone being a Debbie Downer must have a miserable life at home. This is the youngest, most talented Panthers team we’ve had since at least 2015. Just stop over analyzing and enjoy the ride. Personally I think we’re gonna shock the world this year.

Let’s fuging get it!!

We've been beaten down for years, and they straight up told us we were going to be in a several year long rebuild. It's hard to be optimistic. I wouldn't be surprised if we squeaked into the playoffs but I also wouldn't be surprised if we ended up in the bottom 5.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am optimistic.  I think the OL fears are overblown, but there is a genuine concern.  we need 1 more year and it should be on C, G, and LT (unless we figure it out this year).  MLB is a worry, but with a heavier Carter and Luvu there, I am OK for now--DTs need to keep them free to roam.

Every team has a weakness or two. We are now in the conversation.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PandaMan said:

Luvu has impressed big time.  If he doesn’t make the 53 I’ll really question some things.  Really stoked for this young squad!

Everything I have read and heard about him is his motor is non-stop.  They say not too many on the team can keep up with him.  

Another Jet castoff.  I would love to see him on the 53 and playing in some defensive packages.  We need guys like him.  "He's always around the ball"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Not mentioned often but oh so true.

Yep. We still don't know whether our getting gashed in the run will change from last year. That's something to keep an eye on because it could nullify a lot of the gains we may have made in the secondary if we can't get improvement in that area.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, therealmjl said:

Not really. Just thought it was about CMC.

it’s not really a glowing endorsement…and it still starts and ends with him.

Sam Darnold, who's made progress seeing the field better/faster, w/coaches tailoring the O to him.'

Then what type of statement(see above) is it in your opinion?  

I wouldn't say it's "glowing" either but it's still a Positive one.  🙂

12 hours ago, mav1234 said:

The questions about Darnold always were about processing so that comment is encouraging.

Of course I'd rather it be "omg who knew how amazing Darnold would be outside NY!!!"... But the reality is it was never going to be that fast a turnaround, if one happens at all

I personally thought those questions about processing were bulls--t as there have been video of him making his progressions but because he had virtually zero talent to surround him, he had to more often than not play Hero-Ball and try to make plays out of nothing.    

Now that he has the weapons he never had in NY, he *should* be good.   *SHOULD*. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CanePantherHornet said:

We've been beaten down for years, and they straight up told us we were going to be in a several year long rebuild. It's hard to be optimistic. I wouldn't be surprised if we squeaked into the playoffs but I also wouldn't be surprised if we ended up in the bottom 5.

Yeah, I get it.  Personally I start every season optimistic until I am given reason not to be by their play on the field in actual games that count. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...