Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule's QBs troughout his coaching career


JABANOG
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

That's pretty a pretty bold statement only because of Newton's MVP and Super Bowl Appearance. He'll have to win a lot of shootouts in the AFC, but It's not like it isn't possible. I think he'll have a solid career, but not sure if I see the kid winning any MVP's. Time will tell. Definitely gonna be exciting if most of the QB's in this class pan out. Probably won't be excitement in here though. 

Newton .5 is Justin Fields - it's the only reason I can point to as to why so many on here are in love with him. 

He kinda reminds them of a watered down version of Newton. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Newton .5 is Justin Fields - it's the only reason I can point to as to why so many on here are in love with him. 

He kinda reminds them of a watered down version of Newton. 

I personally don't see a comparison between the two. I mean other than race lol. I also don't think we got to see the best Newton we possibly could have. Not saying we didn't do anything for him, but we could have done a lot more for the man. Guess that's why we don't have the same FO today as we did in the Cam era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall it was Rivera that played Cam while he was hurt and it was Hurnia that threw Cam out like leftovers .  Rhule had stated that would like to coach Cam but was not given the opportunity .  Fitts did not want to give up all our draft capital for a rookie QB .  Darnald may not be the answer but at least he has some experience and has talent .  Lets see how he does before throwing Rhule under the bus .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I genuinely don't see Fox or Rivera rebuilding two college programmes - one that was burnt down to the foundations.

They're not that guy. They can take a poor team and make it mediocre (with the odd good season sprinkled in there). They're not programme builders - Rhule is. In both cases in college he was poached by a bigger organisation before he could truly reap the benefits of what he was sowing. 

Well, they aren’t college coaches.  I wasn’t alluding to them being able to go college.   

But Ron and Fox are the NFL variant IMO.  You could give them the worst team in the NFL.  Give them 3-4 years.  And it would be respectable IMO.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Newton .5 is Justin Fields - it's the only reason I can point to as to why so many on here are in love with him. 

He kinda reminds them of a watered down version of Newton. 

It was the Clemson game that really sold me on Fields. He took a big shot, and wasn't 100% after it. But despite that, he gutted out the game and got his team the W.  That night, I said the kid was going to be a good one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, they aren’t college coaches.  I wasn’t alluding to them being able to go college.   

But Ron and Fox are the NFL variant IMO.  
You could give them the worst team in the NFL.  Give them 4 years.  And it would be respectable IMO.   
 

 

A skosh over .500 is respectable, I guess. Those "play not to lose/defensive" HCs typically beat the bad teams, lose to the good ones and have anomaly seasons where their talent takes them farther. Rhule seems way more adaptive than either of those two.

Edited by Khaki Lackey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

A skosh over .500 is respectable, I guess. Those "play not to lose/defensive" HCs typically beat the bad teams, lose to the good ones and have anomaly seasons where their talent takes them farther. Rhule seems way more adaptive than either of those two.

Doesn’t the bolded largely apply to all 3 though?   Would that not describe Rhule’s overall college experience? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JABANOG said:

Temple

13-16 PJ Walker

Baylor

17 Zach Smith/ Charlie Brewer 

18-19 Charlie Brewer 

Panthers

20 Teddy/PJ/Will

21 Darnold/PJ/Will

 

Yea this man shouldn't be making the QB decisions even with full roster control it seems he's never even had an AVERAGE QB 

Lame, really Lame.

College replace coaches because their current team sucks.  Top level HS QBs aren't going to go to a program that doesn't give them the best opportunity to succeed.  The rare exception is a hometown star that wants to play locally.  

To Rhule's credit he built both programs from the ground up.

2020 was Brady if you ask me.  I think he wanted Bridgewater since he had some success with him in New Orleans.  Made sense.

Darnold was Rhule and Fitterer.  So we'll see.

What really chaps my ass is the multitude of posters, like you, that want to just post negative threads.  It's one thing to post a negative thread with valid points but to reach on a topic like this one is very lame.

If you don't like the Panther's good or bad. Go join another fan base and spread your hate there. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...