Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule's Interview Post-Cut Down


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

It sort of goes without saying that he’s here as long as Rhule is here. He’s the new Brenton Bersin. 

I get the feeling you may be iffy with our coach's plan and the current backup QB.  Call it a hunch.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Are you really giving Matt Rhule like 5-6 losing seasons? That’s a lot of patience. 

And more than the owner will have lol

he haS this year and next year….best be a solid 10 and 7 or that seat Tepper owns is going to get mighty hot 

I’m constantly  amazed at the number of Baylor and Temple  players he trots out

who knew they were such power houses in the NCAA   I learn something every day 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

And more than the owner will have lol

he haS this year and next year….best be a solid 10 and 7 or that seat Tepper owns is going to get mighty hot 

I’m constantly  amazed at the number of Baylor and Temple  players he trots out

who knew they were such power houses in the NCAA   I learn something every day 

Every coach we have had has made the playoffs within the first 3 seasons.  Except for one and he only lasted 3.  
 

Rhule needs to be in the playoffs in 3 years IMO

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we min need 8 wins or else the seat as mentioned will get mighty hot.  And then we give them an ultimatum to find a QB. 

Personally, I'm not bought into Darnold until I see something better than NYJ. However, I'm not bought out of the staff and that we don't have a good trajectory going on with Rhule & Brady.  Rhule has been here what, ~400 days? Let's see how they respond their second season, let it unfold a bit into the year; that's typically a make or break timeframe to see if these guys are on par with quality NFL coaches or if they can only do so much. 

Overall, I hope Tepper can recognize if that becomes the case but it's too early to judge either way (at least for me).  I thought Rhule passed a few good 1st year tests last season.  

It find it odd that people are so on about basically having our 4th TE (who still may be cut), 2 promising young DBs, and a somewhat crappy aggressive backup QB from Temple who may not even survive the coming weeks.  OH NO, SCHOOL BIAS! 

Edited by davos
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

It sort of goes without saying that he’s here as long as Rhule is here. He’s the new Brenton Bersin. 

Dunno man…both were suspect and if PJ sees much field time we know we are in trouble.  Loyalty won out but that can cost you in this league 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rmoneyg35 said:

I just don’t see us keeping 5 TE. I think we have too many special teams players as it is but our staff seems to like the guys who don’t really offer anything except special teams.

I would love to get a new back up QB but who? Who can we get that can play in our system and can learn our playbook? If we replace Walker with a different QB we could be screwed if Darnold gets hurt. You can’t expect a QB to do well if they hardly know the playbook. Then again PJ Walker isn’t that good either. Our team put a lot of faith in Darnold.

 

I guess it’s a smart decision because it Darnold ends up being a bust then we will suck and need to get a top QB in the draft. So if he sucks we should end up with a top draft pick to get a QB. If he does well then we should be a good team and not need a QB in the draft.

Edit: nevermind

Edited by CPcavedweller
fug it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, davos said:

He explicitly mentioned that as a head coach and GM, if you drafted a guy that doesn't fit in your plans anymore, you need to learn to move on.

This is the most promising thing to me.

For those thinking Rhule will be out after 3 years, that's not going to happen. Rhule will get at least four years before they turn on the seat warmer. His long contract will see to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Canes now have 19 losses on the year. Here is the truly alarming stat. 13 of those were multiple goal loses. 9 of those were 3 goal plus losses. This team is getting blown out more than any other year under Rod.     why?  Blue line is a total mess. It’s just no good with their combinations.  It pains me to say this, but they were mikes better with Burns and Orlov. They need Slavin so bad.  Health.  Size. The team is too small and has no physical play. Most forwards do not forecheck.  Worst under Rod.  Goalie play. Pretty average to sub par. PK is downright bad. It’s allowing a little over a goal a game. Worst under Rod.    Team will not win a playoff round under its current group of players. It’s not constructed to do so against heavy teams.      solutions.  Must get physical size by the trade deadline. Rod and Tulsky know this. That probably has to come with the 2C.  KKs size but a better scorer and meaner.  The need another physical winger.  Goalie. Either go all in on a top guy on a bad team or get average. Lastly, better defense. Need a Right shot heavy defenseman.  Yes that could mean someone’s favorite dman could sit. Looking at you Boom.    thats 3-4 new guys that must be brought in for them to have a chance at a cup.  And it’s all players that are different and better than what they have.  They have the cap. KK is gone. Add 4 mill back.    And then hope it’s jells unlike Mikko.  
×
×
  • Create New...