Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christensen and Brown "close to contributing"


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

He was not the best by a wide margin. We signed him anyway. Remember that was an initial flurry signing which was why a lot of the NFL pundits scratched their heads at the timing and contract(this goes for Erving too).

I think the Panthers wanted to "solve" the OL problem before the draft to give themselves flexibility to go BPA.  

The only problem is that they deluded themselves into thinking these two signings would actually fix their OL.  It seems pretty clear now that both contracts were a reach.   

Sad thing is most of the NFL scouting community seemed to already know that. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

He was not the best by a wide margin. We signed him anyway. Remember that was an initial flurry signing which was why a lot of the NFL pundits scratched their heads at the timing and contract(this goes for Erving too).

I tend to agree but I would caution you about listening to pundits.  They don't lose their jobs if they are wrong.

But just watching the game you can obviously see the tackles are not our problem.  Eflin is the head scratcher for me unless they just needed a backup center and even then I would have looked somewhere else.  Injury and inexperience has culminated in the lineup you see now.  This upcoming game may be the last time you see the current guard lineup. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I don’t mind that they jumped early just not sure what caught their eye on Elflein and why we took a LS and even a DT (both may have been available as UDFAs) when there were more potential OL available. We know at least one is starting. I get wanting vets like Erving and a G before the draft because you never know how the draft goes and we had ew and Moton. If the plan was a 3rd and 6th rounder then we should have spent a little more and gotten at least one solid G not Elflein.

I don't think they had a specific oline position targeted other than the LT that was taken at 7.  The rest were arranged by groups regardless of the round projection.  I think I heard  Fitt say his cutoff for true top 10 talent was 11 or 12, I think, but that's another topic.  That's why they kept trading back because the difference after the first 10 or 12 in their mind was miniscule.  Apparently this draft wasn't top heavy in their minds.

Don't shoot the messenger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I was happy with the draft aside from the LS and the trading down worked. I just think we needed to make at least 1 or 2 more of the 11 picks OL.

The LS will start next season. Forward thinking is never a bad thing. 

The question you should ask yourself is this, is the team as a whole more talented and deeper than the season before? I think you know the answer. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthera onca said:

Film review must have been brutal.

Yea I noticed after the game Rhule commented that the protection was pretty good but then in the Monday afternoon interview (after watching film) he specifically mentioned that they had to protect Darnold better.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

I would imagine both will be starting at some point this season. I would assume it's the mental part of the game and not the physical part,that's keeping them from starting rn.

There's a lot more protections to learn and more refinement in technique generally needed at this level for most prospects.  Some pick it up naturally some take a bit of practice.  They've shown us that they can hold their own with their peers during the preseason practices.  It's just a matter of getting over the shock of going up against nfl first stringers, that's what separates the men from the boys.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I tend to agree but I would caution you about listening to pundits.  They don't lose their jobs if they are wrong.

But just watching the game you can obviously see the tackles are not our problem.  Eflin is the head scratcher for me unless they just needed a backup center and even then I would have looked somewhere else.  Injury and inexperience has culminated in the lineup you see now.  This upcoming game may be the last time you see the current guard lineup. 

I am concerned the biggest issue is that either we just don't consider OL a major priority(yet) or our franchise simply does not evaluate them very well.

There aren't many explanations for why we have made the moves we have made the past two seasons(or the past decade). I guess we'll find out what the story is the next couple of seasons.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...