Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christensen and Brown "close to contributing"


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

He was not the best by a wide margin. We signed him anyway. Remember that was an initial flurry signing which was why a lot of the NFL pundits scratched their heads at the timing and contract(this goes for Erving too).

I think the Panthers wanted to "solve" the OL problem before the draft to give themselves flexibility to go BPA.  

The only problem is that they deluded themselves into thinking these two signings would actually fix their OL.  It seems pretty clear now that both contracts were a reach.   

Sad thing is most of the NFL scouting community seemed to already know that. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

He was not the best by a wide margin. We signed him anyway. Remember that was an initial flurry signing which was why a lot of the NFL pundits scratched their heads at the timing and contract(this goes for Erving too).

I tend to agree but I would caution you about listening to pundits.  They don't lose their jobs if they are wrong.

But just watching the game you can obviously see the tackles are not our problem.  Eflin is the head scratcher for me unless they just needed a backup center and even then I would have looked somewhere else.  Injury and inexperience has culminated in the lineup you see now.  This upcoming game may be the last time you see the current guard lineup. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I don’t mind that they jumped early just not sure what caught their eye on Elflein and why we took a LS and even a DT (both may have been available as UDFAs) when there were more potential OL available. We know at least one is starting. I get wanting vets like Erving and a G before the draft because you never know how the draft goes and we had ew and Moton. If the plan was a 3rd and 6th rounder then we should have spent a little more and gotten at least one solid G not Elflein.

I don't think they had a specific oline position targeted other than the LT that was taken at 7.  The rest were arranged by groups regardless of the round projection.  I think I heard  Fitt say his cutoff for true top 10 talent was 11 or 12, I think, but that's another topic.  That's why they kept trading back because the difference after the first 10 or 12 in their mind was miniscule.  Apparently this draft wasn't top heavy in their minds.

Don't shoot the messenger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I was happy with the draft aside from the LS and the trading down worked. I just think we needed to make at least 1 or 2 more of the 11 picks OL.

The LS will start next season. Forward thinking is never a bad thing. 

The question you should ask yourself is this, is the team as a whole more talented and deeper than the season before? I think you know the answer. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthera onca said:

Film review must have been brutal.

Yea I noticed after the game Rhule commented that the protection was pretty good but then in the Monday afternoon interview (after watching film) he specifically mentioned that they had to protect Darnold better.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

I would imagine both will be starting at some point this season. I would assume it's the mental part of the game and not the physical part,that's keeping them from starting rn.

There's a lot more protections to learn and more refinement in technique generally needed at this level for most prospects.  Some pick it up naturally some take a bit of practice.  They've shown us that they can hold their own with their peers during the preseason practices.  It's just a matter of getting over the shock of going up against nfl first stringers, that's what separates the men from the boys.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I tend to agree but I would caution you about listening to pundits.  They don't lose their jobs if they are wrong.

But just watching the game you can obviously see the tackles are not our problem.  Eflin is the head scratcher for me unless they just needed a backup center and even then I would have looked somewhere else.  Injury and inexperience has culminated in the lineup you see now.  This upcoming game may be the last time you see the current guard lineup. 

I am concerned the biggest issue is that either we just don't consider OL a major priority(yet) or our franchise simply does not evaluate them very well.

There aren't many explanations for why we have made the moves we have made the past two seasons(or the past decade). I guess we'll find out what the story is the next couple of seasons.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...