Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady Christensen didn't trip himself.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Zod said:

image.png

 

Erving stepped on his left foot making Brady fall backwards. It looked like he tripped on his own feet initially. 

Nice photo.  I am relieved.  Although I look at this photo, and I see some positives and negatives.

Cam's form is good.  Christensen's feet are too close together--maybe because 320 lbs was on one them.  Miller needs better arm extension and more knee bend and less waist bend.  Paradis looks good--he gets in trouble when they bull rush him and he is in good shape vs. the bull rush.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panther'sBigD said:

It looks like he was hesitating a little bit and was slow getting to wherever he should have been, and that's when Erving got manhandled right over top of him. He'll get it figured out once the game starts to slow down. He's definitely got the physical tools. 

Yeah, it's like young guys in college getting their first reps. You generally need somewhere between 100-200 live snaps before a linemen really starts having things slow down for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Panfan35 said:

When they had Brady at Lt and brown at LG in the preseason they looked real solid pancaking guys 

They are. As long as the are up against equal talent they can and will hold their own. The level of competition has gone up a notch though since those preseason games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...