Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are 3-1

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

The fumble (that was CLEARLY a fumble) no-call changed the trajectory of that game.

That being said, we were up 14-13 at the half. We got blown out in the 3rd. That’s on us. We need a better o-line. Darnold played better than he should have with this line.

That no call was infuriating. Would've been a huge momentum shift for us and we would've been more comfortable heading into the second half with more confidence.

Pathetic reffing display again, but we gotta overcome it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mbarbour21 Proficient

mbarbour21

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

That no call was infuriating. Would've been a huge momentum shift for us and we would've been more comfortable heading into the second half with more confidence.

Pathetic reffing display again, but we gotta overcome it.

Facts. Like I said, it could have been the difference, but we will never know. We were still up going into half but got destroyed in the 3rd….so who knows? But it definitely gave Dallas a spark. Anyone who says it didn’t matter much doesn’t understand LIFE much less football.

We are exactly where I predicted before the regular season began, 3-1 with a loss to Dallas. 
(Just to state again, that No Call was a load of crap and heavily favored Dallas. I’m still pissed.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Huddler Veteran

The Huddler

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My concern is that we didn't look like we belonged on the field with them until they bafflingly went prevent and rested their best DB late.

we did the whole first half

 

 

once they got up on is they could pin their ears back and get after darnold with this POS OL, causing him to make bad decisions

 

we certainly looked like we belonged first half and if it werent for the bullshit foreward progress call, we could have gotten up on them and flipped the game script with us pinning our ears back

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My concern is that we didn't look like we belonged on the field with them until they bafflingly went prevent and rested their best DB late.

What game were you watching where they scored 20 of their points on short fields and big plays? 
 

we don’t belong? Please. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, Actionman0z said:

What game were you watching where they scored 20 of their points on short fields and big plays? 

The ultimate momentum shifter honestly and the real reason Dallas one.

They got more short fields than us and capitalized. They also created more turnovers.

Panthers were competitive up to that point. Not many teams in the league can overcome a situation like that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They adjusted at halftime and we didn't. Felt like the good old days again.

I've been thinking about this a bit, and I keep wondering if that's the problem.  Seems like our offense goes in at halftime and says "We're moving the ball well, points will come, keep doing what we're doing".  Even if we're right, we're wrong.  Even the defense seems to lag a bit.

Someone on that staff needs to be thinking a step ahead.  "Ok, we did well, what adjustments will the opponents make to slow us down?  How will we react to that?"  It's like we take a quarter or so to adjust when we should have been ready for it coming out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Saca312 said:

The ultimate momentum shifter honestly and the real reason Dallas one.

They got more short fields than us and capitalized. They also created more turnovers.

Panthers were competitive up to that point. Not many teams in the league can overcome a situation like that.

Panthers were also competitive to make it an 8-point game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...