Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How was this forward progress?


Mage
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh, incompetence was definitely at play. You absolutely cannot after the fact make a determination of stopped forward progress on a play that has resulted in a fumble with no whistle on the field. That's inexcusable officiating. 

Fair point I only felt that the previous fumble skewed the call

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Star Platinum said:

Fair point I only felt that the previous fumble skewed the call

When in doubt, go with the call that's reviewable. I don't know if refs are taught that but if they aren't they should be. This is why they hold the whistle so much on plays that look like they should be blown dead sometimes. Once that whistle blows the play is dead. What you REALLY can't do as a ref is manufacture a whistle that was never blown and call a play dead after the fact due to the result of the play. That's how you get accused of game fixing or score fixing because it sure looks like you're doing some fixing. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

When in doubt, go with the call that's reviewable. I don't know if refs are taught that but if they aren't they should be. This is why they hold the whistle so much on plays that look like they should be blown dead sometimes. Once that whistle blows the play is dead. What you REALLY can't do as a ref is manufacture a whistle that was never blown and call a play dead after the fact due to the result of the play. That's how you get accused of game fixing it score fixing because it sure looks like you're doing some fixing 

True I personally don’t understand the idea behind “yeah we know but that’s not reviewable and therefore not fixable” it’s a tad illogical 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure how much he was a long term piece of this team.   Sucks to not have him as part of the rotation.   Looks like it's Lee Hunter time.     
    • This post was an error. Oops and sorry for the errors in the previous one. Too slow to edit.   We’ll see what they do.  
    • I am not sure he will put the over the games but we’ll probably have them.   Two things I am thinking.  We have 4 preseason games.  All the coaches have enough service time to know the standards that are in place for decades. If I recall it was play your starters just a series to start woth and build it up until week theee where play a lot and you have week four to set hour roster. Evaluate before cuts.   Bevell will certainly have the whole thing down pat.   I’d they don’t do the fries and frie air will worry too. Because it is set up to do that.     I have said since they went t three preseason people have to figure a new way are still feeling it out and trying things.  We don’t have to this year.  
×
×
  • Create New...